Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Using a secondary set of nameservers for dynamic blocking

2011-08-15 Thread Ed W
On 15/08/2011 14:16, richardvo...@gmail.com wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Sam Crawford wrote: >> Ed, >> >> Many thanks for the suggestion. You're quite right - my server-side >> idea was effectively re-inventing the wheel. I've ended up going with >> rbldnsd, which has been a breeze to

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Using a secondary set of nameservers for dynamic blocking

2011-08-15 Thread richardvo...@gmail.com
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Sam Crawford wrote: > Ed, > > Many thanks for the suggestion. You're quite right - my server-side > idea was effectively re-inventing the wheel. I've ended up going with > rbldnsd, which has been a breeze to setup for this task (even with > millions of records) and

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Using a secondary set of nameservers for dynamic blocking

2011-08-15 Thread Sam Crawford
Ed, Many thanks for the suggestion. You're quite right - my server-side idea was effectively re-inventing the wheel. I've ended up going with rbldnsd, which has been a breeze to setup for this task (even with millions of records) and no code changes were required. The next step is to focus on the