Simon Kelley wrote:
A C wrote:
I'm running dnsmasq 2.35 but it's on an embedded system and the
package manager hasn't created a new version yet. I wanted to know
how vulnerable I was to the recent security alert regarding DNS and
whether there's a potential workaround that I could put in plac
A C wrote:
I'm running dnsmasq 2.35 but it's on an embedded system and the package
manager hasn't created a new version yet. I wanted to know how
vulnerable I was to the recent security alert regarding DNS and whether
there's a potential workaround that I could put in place for now.
"How v
I'm running dnsmasq 2.35 but it's on an embedded system and the package manager
hasn't created a new version yet. I wanted to know how vulnerable I was to the
recent security alert regarding DNS and whether there's a potential workaround
that I could put in place for now.
Thanks,
Alex
__
> 1) copies the new /etc/resolv.conf file to /etc/resolv.conf.dnsmasq
> 2) copies a static /etc/resolv.conf.perm to /etc/resolv.conf
> 3) sends dnsmasq a reload/reread config files instruction
> 4) if needed, reloads other network services that need to be
> restarted/reconfigured
> is there a anot
hey gang:
I got a new ISP yesterday and the network setup is slightly different,
and now my dnsmasq doesnt work the way I want it to.
BRIEF SETUP DESCRIPTION --- OLD WAY
all ethernet adapters on my home firewall/internal dhcp/dns server are
static private ips
the dsl modem has the public ip addre
dnsmasq, like most things, was better back in the eleventh century...
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 3:14 PM, xerces8 wrote:
> Simon Kelley wrote:
>
> > xerces8 wrote:
> > > Simon Kelley wrote :
> > >
> > >> I'm removing the 2.44 tarball from the website to avoid confusion.
> > >
> > > To avoid even mo
