It can't be a WG meeting in 2019 without a KSK Rollover presentation!!!
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 11:11 AM Shane Kerr
wrote:
> Colleagues,
>
> Here's a (hopefully) final agenda for the DNS working group session in
> RIPE 78.
>
> Peter Špaček's presentation on the DNS Flag Day 2019 will be given a
First question is (and RIPE should have the data) how many delegations do
they reject because
the server is an open recursor ? In today's world, I suspect it would be
quite low
Tim
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 3:23 AM Måns Nilsson
wrote:
> Recently, a discussion regarding the checks performed by the
I support Shane!
Tim
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 4:48 AM Antonio Prado via dns-wg
wrote:
> On 10/1/19 9:07 AM, Dave Knight wrote:
> >> If selected again you have my commitment for the next 3-years.
>
> support
> --
> antonio
>
>
I love both candidates equally. I must protest making me choose.
Moritz if the group wants to dig into more research discussions, but I like
Brett's TLD and operations view of the world.
I can't choose, sorry. Both will serve well.
Indecisive tim
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 5:23 AM Matthijs Mekk
One place I worked we would make decisions on who would end up with some
maintenance nobody wanted with a spirited match of rock-paper-scissors.
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:20 AM Jim Reid wrote:
>
>
> > On 12 Nov 2021, at 10:36, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> >
> > I love bot
I support lowering the TTL on the DS records to 3600.
I support lowering the TTL on the NS records - I was going to put my hat in
for 21600,
but Mr van Dijk's suggestion of 3600 is very enticing.
But I liked Mr. Lawrence's suggestion on gathering data on lowering the NS
records TTL.
Perhaps the T
+1 For Mr Moritz
tim
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 2:03 AM Peter Thomassen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Moritz has my support!
>
> Peter
>
> On 4/23/24 20:52, Willem Toorop wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > The deadline for volunteers/nominations has passed and I am very pleased
> to announce that we received a sing
