Re: [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working group chair

2020-10-15 Thread Paul Ebersman
dave> If the working group feels strongly about encouraging new faces dave> perhaps we should amend the process such that new co-chairs may dave> servce onlky a single term? Maybe have the outgoing and existing chairs explicitly go out and encourage someone who hasn't served before to volunteer? A

Re: [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working group chair

2020-10-15 Thread Paul Ebersman
dknight> I struggle to reconcile our efforts toward impartiality with dknight> the notion of having the chairs encouraging a preferred dknight> candidate. jim> It depends on what's meant by encouragement. I'm fairly sure Paul jim> means approaching someone (or more than one) and saying "Have you

Re: [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations

2021-12-02 Thread Paul Ebersman
gregory> Maybe allow users to set TTL on "domain" object in RIPE gregory> database? Be nice if we could expand to a more sane/standard set of TTLs for NS/DS in TLD/SLDs, which makes this non-functional for a slew of such zones. gregory> Allowed values can be constrained to few common lengths of g