Anand Buddhdev writes:
> We propose to lower, in the first quarter of 2022, the TTL on NS records
> to 86400 and on DS records to 3600.
I am in favor of this change. I'd also like if the change was
accompanied by measurements of the effect on the relevant
authoritative nameservers to determine w
Edward Lewis writes:
> I once did some work [that could not be made public] where I began
> to suspect that the two were unrelated.
Unrelated, or just less correlated than you might otherwise imagine?
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your
subscripti
Edward Lewis writes:
> >Unrelated, or just less correlated than you might otherwise imagine?
>
> Unrelated.
>
> I'd studied an event which made it apparent that resolvers vastly
> ignored the long TTLs in play. At the time I learned that two
> popular strains of resolver code had an "interna
