Awesome name for a new appliance: ACA
Anycasted Crap Absorber
;)
On 10/14/15 11:30 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> q: where should we place instances?
>>> a: near folk who need queries answered. bzzzt! no!
>>> a: near the sources of the rubbish so it can be absorbed quickly
>>
>> Interesting point.
Interesting idea.
On 10/14/15 2:46 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
>
>
> On 14 Oct 2015, at 11:49, Carlos M. Martinez wrote:
>
>> Awesome name for a new appliance: ACA
>>
>> Anycasted Crap Absorber
>
> If we had some reasonable measure of crap, it might be interesti
I’m sure there are plenty of people that will disagree with me, but, IMO, you
should never put stateful devices in front of a DNS server. It’s better to have
plenty DNS servers on different networks and let them crash and burn if
necessary. Just like you never put bananas in the refrigerator :-)
It talks about rate limiting, which seems to me is a bit hard to do in a
stateless way :-D
> On Jun 28, 2016, at 10:59 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:46:17AM -0300,
> Carlos M. Martinez wrote
> a message of 31 lines which said:
>
>> I
Thanks!
> On Jun 28, 2016, at 11:58 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> Carlos M. Martinez wrote:
>> It talks about rate limiting, which seems to me is a bit hard to do in a
>> stateless way :-D
>
> Queue / buffer management does not need to be stateful. Most
> impleme
Unconditional support :-)
On 14 Oct 2020, at 10:29, Dave Knight wrote:
Please offer whatever support (or opposition) you have for Joao on the
list.
