Thank you Anand and team!
Out of curiosity, do you notice an increase in load at your servers?
—
Moritz
> On 20 Apr 2022, at 10:23, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> This work has been completed, and all zones are now being published with
> lower TTLs.
>
> Regards,
> Anand Bud
Hi Moritz,
In the past 24 hours, we have not seen *any* increase in the query rate.
I also checked the individual query rates for NS and DS records, and
they are at the same levels as before the change.
I'll check again tomorrow, after the original 2-day TTL expires, and
report if I see any
On 4/21/22, 4:23 AM, "dns-wg on behalf of Anand Buddhdev"
wrote:
>In the past 24 hours, we have not seen *any* increase in the query rate.
I'm not shocked - but if this holds up, it'll seriously challenge the commonly
held belief that TTL and query rate are inversely proportional.
I once
Edward Lewis writes:
> I once did some work [that could not be made public] where I began
> to suspect that the two were unrelated.
Unrelated, or just less correlated than you might otherwise imagine?
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your
subscripti
On 4/21/22, 1:46 PM, "Dave Lawrence" wrote:
>Edward Lewis writes:
>> I once did some work [that could not be made public] where I began
>> to suspect that the two were unrelated.
>
>Unrelated, or just less correlated than you might otherwise imagine?
Unrelated.
I'd studied an e
Edward Lewis writes:
> >Unrelated, or just less correlated than you might otherwise imagine?
>
> Unrelated.
>
> I'd studied an event which made it apparent that resolvers vastly
> ignored the long TTLs in play. At the time I learned that two
> popular strains of resolver code had an "interna
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 2:57 PM, Dave Lawrence wrote:
> Edward Lewis writes:
>
> Unrelated, or just less correlated than you might otherwise imagine?
>
> Unrelated.
>
> I'd studied an event which made it apparent that resolvers vastly ignored
> the long TTLs in play. At the time I learned that tw
