Colleagues, you will be aware that we have adopted a procedure for the regular
appointment of a WG co-chair. It is now going to be invoked for the first time.
If you are interested in helping to run the WG, now's your chance to step
forward.
The main responsibility for a co-chair is to prepare
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 01:42:25PM +0100, Jim Reid wrote:
> Colleagues, you will be aware that we have adopted a procedure for the
> regular appointment of a WG co-chair. It is now going to be invoked for the
> first time.
Maybe my old eyes are failing me - but is this to add a WG co-chair
Dear WG,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 01:42:25PM +0100, Jim Reid wrote:
> The barriers for entry are zero. Anyone can volunteer simply by posting to
> the list. You can nominate anyone, including yourself. It might be helpful
> for candidates to give the WG an explanation of why they have been nomin
On 12 Oct 2015, at 15:19, Gert Doering wrote:
> Maybe my old eyes are failing me - but is this to add a WG co-chair to
> the existing group, or is one of you stepping down - and if yes, who?
Hi Gert.
The object of this exercise is not to add another co-chair. Our procedure only
allows for 2 o
On 12 Oct 2015, at 15:49, Peter Koch wrote:
> And this is meant literally, i.e., after more than a decade
> as a DNS WG co-chair I will not make myself available for another election
> or appointment. It has been a pleasure to serve this community in that role,
> and I'll promise (or threaten, i
Hi Peter,
> so that you do not wonder we'd add a fourth co-chair in violation of the
> rules, I'd like to let you know that taking advantage of the absence of
> defined terms for the transition I have decided to give it a start and
> vacate my seat. And this is meant literally, i.e., after more t
