[dns-wg] reminder about the WG Chair appointment process

2014-11-25 Thread Jim Reid
Colleagues, there's been very little response or discussion about the procedure which was proposed at the beginning of October. I think it's now time to start a "Last Call" on this. If anyone has any tweaks to he proposed text or counter proposals, please speak up now! It would be helpful if an

Re: [dns-wg] reminder about the WG Chair appointment process

2014-11-25 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 25/11/2014 12:09, Jim Reid wrote: > In case anyone cares, here's that proposed text again. Jim, the proposal is non-deterministic. There's no discriminator in place to decide who gets to stand down if N changes and two chairs need to stand down at the same time, or if somehow the chair terms b

Re: [dns-wg] reminder about the WG Chair appointment process

2014-11-25 Thread Michael Daly
> On 25 Nov 2014, at 12:37, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > On 25/11/2014 12:09, Jim Reid wrote: >> In case anyone cares, here's that proposed text again. > > Jim, the proposal is non-deterministic. There's no discriminator in place > to decide who gets to stand down if N changes and two chairs need

Re: [dns-wg] reminder about the WG Chair appointment process

2014-11-25 Thread Jim Reid
On 25 Nov 2014, at 12:37, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Jim, the proposal is non-deterministic. Nick, thanks for your comments. I'm both surprised and disappointed. Surprised because the mood of the room/WG appears to be the proposed text is "good enough". Nobody has advocated making radical surger

Re: [dns-wg] reminder about the WG Chair appointment process

2014-11-25 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 25/11/2014 14:42, Jim Reid wrote: > Nick, thanks for your comments. > > I'm both surprised and disappointed. Surprised because the mood of the > room/WG appears to be the proposed text is "good enough". Nobody has > advocated making radical surgery to it despite the proposed text being > in cir

Re: [dns-wg] reminder about the WG Chair appointment process

2014-11-25 Thread Peter Koch
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:09:25PM +, Jim Reid wrote: > [2] A co-chair will serve a term of N years, where N is the number > of co-chairs. Terms will be staggered so that one term expires every > year. A co-chair cannot serve more than 2 consecutive terms. as was mentioned during the session,

Re: [dns-wg] reminder about the WG Chair appointment process

2014-11-25 Thread Jim Reid
On 25 Nov 2014, at 17:54, Nick Hilliard wrote: > You're welcome for the comments. I wasn't able to make the london wg > session and only subscribed to the mailing list on Oct 11, which was a > couple of days after the previous discussion about chair proposals ended. > Timing is everything, appar