Hi Nick,
On 15/03/12 16:44 , Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Hi Romeo,
>
> thanks for the comprehensive replies, both here and on the blog.
And likewise, thanks for the discussion. No doubt more people on the
list share your questions. :)
> On 12/03/2015 09:29, Romeo Zwart wrote:
>> There are two driver
Hi Romeo,
thanks for the comprehensive replies, both here and on the blog.
On 12/03/2015 09:29, Romeo Zwart wrote:
> There are two drivers for that. We receive many requests from
> prospective new K-root hosts. We have considered how to respond to this
> demand from the community. This made us pr
Hi Randy, all,
Thanks for your questions.
On 15/03/12 03:40 , Randy Bush wrote:
> hi mirjam, romeo, et alia,
>
> this looke cool, and lighter weight. but a few questions as usual.
>> In the new model, the K-root hosted node will only peer with one
>> party, the local host, and the local host is
hi mirjam, romeo, et alia,
this looke cool, and lighter weight. but a few questions as usual.
> In the new model, the K-root hosted node will only peer with one
> party, the local host, and the local host is responsible for further
> propagation of the K-root prefix[1]
does this add an as hop,
Dear colleagues,
We have redesigned the K-root architecture for our hosted nodes,
formerly known as K-root local instances. System architecture and
network setup have been simplified a lot. This will reduce our
management effort for K-root and reduce costs for K-root hosts.
More details on RIPE L
