Re: [dns-wg] DNS wg co-chair selection: candidates

2022-10-10 Thread Sander Steffann
Hi WG! > The deadline for the DNS co-chair candidate volunteering is now over. > > We have a single excellent candidate. > > The period to express support (or concern) for the candidate starts now and > runs until Wednesday, 26 October 2022. > > Below find a few words from the candidate. > >

Re: [dns-wg] Lower TTLs for NS and DS records in reverse DNS delegations

2021-12-02 Thread Sander Steffann
Hi Petr, > I think lowering both TTLs is a step in right direction, but let me ask > provocative question: > > Why not make the TTL _dynamic_, based on time of last change in the RIPE > database? Because explicit is better than implicit. Magically calculated dynamic values rarely match operat

Re: [dns-wg] SLD .gov.* within european countries

2018-06-10 Thread Sander Steffann
Hi, > I hope you can help me on a not-so-related-to-DNS question. > > does the SLD .gov.* within european countries' ccTLDs identify only > central government bodies and not local government or other public > administrations as well? gov.nl has no special meaning (.nl doesn't do official SLDs),

Re: [dns-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Is Your ISP Hijacking Your DNS Traffic?

2016-07-06 Thread Sander Steffann
Hi, > Op 6 jul. 2016, om 15:26 heeft Jim Reid het volgende > geschreven: > >> On 6 Jul 2016, at 13:21, Max Grobecker >> wrote: >> >> You wrote: >> >>> You can’t blame your service provider for hijacking your DNS traffic or >>> running DPI on their network these days. In fact most of them u

Re: [dns-wg] Co-chair appointment process: 2015 call for volunteers/nominees

2015-10-12 Thread Sander Steffann
Hi Peter, > so that you do not wonder we'd add a fourth co-chair in violation of the > rules, I'd like to let you know that taking advantage of the absence of > defined terms for the transition I have decided to give it a start and > vacate my seat. And this is meant literally, i.e., after more t

Re: [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors

2014-11-18 Thread Sander Steffann
>> Let's have RIPE.INT removed. > > +1 +1 >> Let's have RIPEN.CC removed also. > > +1 +∞ Cheers, Sander