Re: [dns-wg] Candidates for the open co-chair position at the DNS WG

+1 for Dodo! /Jerry -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-wg

Re: [dns-wg] DNS Hackathon 2023

Hi all, Quick reminder, only a few days left to register for the hackathon! Cheers, Jerry On 2/28/23 16:13, Jerry Lundström wrote: Hi all, DNS-OARC, Netnod and RIPE NCC invite you to join us for our DNS Hackathon in Rotterdam, 20 - 21 May 2023 the weekend before RIPE 86!   <ht

[dns-wg] DNS Hackathon 2023

Hi all, DNS-OARC, Netnod and RIPE NCC invite you to join us for our DNS Hackathon in Rotterdam, 20 - 21 May 2023 the weekend before RIPE 86! Apply Now! Special thanks t

Re: [dns-wg] DNS wg co-chair selection: candidates

+1 On 10/10/22 10:03, nico...@ncartron.org wrote: +1 On 10/10/22 10:00 AM, Matthijs Mekking wrote: I agree, I think Willem is an excellent choice. Best regards, Matthijs On 09-10-2022 19:59, Dave Knight wrote: > > >> On Oct 9, 2022, at 13:43, Shane Kerr wrote: >> >> Colleagues, >> >> Th

Re: [dns-wg] DNS wg co-chair selection: candidates

+1 Moritz /Jerry On 11/3/21 2:09 PM, João Damas wrote: > Dear all, > > The deadline for DNS WG co-chair candidate volunteering is now over. > I am happy to announce that we have two great candidates. > The period to express support for your preferred candidate(s) starts now and > runs until N

Re: [dns-wg] DNS Privacy

Hi Allison, On 05/26/16 16:58, Allison Mankin wrote: > Taking a look at the ODVR link, one thing that jumps out at > me is the contrast between end-users purposefully using the server for > privacy and the provision of their DNS query data to the OARC > membership. ODVR was just a thought and at

Re: [dns-wg] DNS Privacy

Hi Sara, On 05/25/16 11:11, Sara Dickinson wrote: > A number of organisations have expressed interest in running such a DNS > Privacy enabled server and we would like to start a discussion in the RIPE > community to see if there is similar interest from within this group. We > would very much l