Re: [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria

2019-06-13 Thread Jonas Frey
> > Well, even if you do not want to change the status quo then this > > complaint has one undoubtful point: > > This whole BCP (whatever that includes in detail) is nowhere > > documented.  > It is now, since Anand replied to the list, in <68c1d8f7-7b0b-a5d0-d1 > ed-d75f21562...@ripe.net> .  > >

Re: [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria

2019-06-13 Thread Piotr Strzyzewski via dns-wg
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 09:40:20AM +0100, Jim Reid wrote: > > On 12 Jun 2019, at 21:06, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > > > we don't really need this because it's not fixing a problem. > > Indeed. There???s no problem here that needs fixing. > > > ... the RIPE NCC's record for handling dns delegation

Re: [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria

2019-06-13 Thread Jim Reid
> On 12 Jun 2019, at 21:06, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > we don't really need this because it's not fixing a problem. Indeed. There’s no problem here that needs fixing. > ... the RIPE NCC's record for handling dns delegation over the years shows > that they're doing a good job and unless this c