> On 10 Jun 2019, at 17:04, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> I couldn't find out how to use the policy process to get RFC 7344 CDS
>> automation in place :-(
Tony, all you need to do is write a proposal and post it to dns-wg@ripe.net.
I’m sure the WG co-chairs will be happy to advise.
> sounds more l
Dear all,
Is a complete overview of the current policy / testing process
available?
To further this discussion - I think it would be good to have a full
understanding of what the current state of affairs is in this context.
Kind regards,
Job
Tony,
On 10/06/2019 17.44, Tony Finch wrote:
Shane Kerr wrote:
The good news is that as a member of the RIPE community, you and all of the
rest of us have a chance to shape the policy here. If we think that we need a
RIPE policy or other RIPE community recommendation to the RIPE NCC regarding
> I couldn't find out how to use the policy process to get RFC 7344 CDS
> automation in place :-(
sounds more like education and engineering than policy. if not the dns
wg, where may be lost in the s:n, maybe an ncc services request.
randy
Shane Kerr wrote:
>
> The good news is that as a member of the RIPE community, you and all of the
> rest of us have a chance to shape the policy here. If we think that we need a
> RIPE policy or other RIPE community recommendation to the RIPE NCC regarding
> delegation to open resolvers, we have a
Måns,
Speaking mostly as myself, except where indicated below
On 10/06/2019 09.22, Måns Nilsson wrote:
Recently, a discussion regarding the checks performed by the NCC before
reverse delegation is made came up on the members-discuss list. It was
concluded that this should be discussed here
First question is (and RIPE should have the data) how many delegations do
they reject because
the server is an open recursor ? In today's world, I suspect it would be
quite low
Tim
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 3:23 AM Måns Nilsson
wrote:
> Recently, a discussion regarding the checks performed by the
Recently, a discussion regarding the checks performed by the NCC before
reverse delegation is made came up on the members-discuss list. It was
concluded that this should be discussed here rather than there.
The members archive might not be available to all, so I'll try to
summarize. Please add yo
