Re: [dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure

2015-01-11 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 11/01/2015 19:51, Jim Reid wrote: > "every calendar year" is even simpler and fewer words than that Nick. :-) depends what you're looking for. If it's the simplest and fewest words, then you will probably want: [2] A co-chair will serve a term of N years. The main thing is that the wording s

Re: [dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure

2015-01-11 Thread Jim Reid
On 11 Jan 2015, at 19:16, Nick Hilliard wrote: > But it was fewer words and simpler to say "every second RIPE meeting". "every calendar year" is even simpler and fewer words than that Nick. :-) I doubt it will matter or if anyone really cares when the selection process kicks in at some point d

Re: [dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure

2015-01-11 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 11/01/2015 15:31, Jim Reid wrote: > Though I'd prefer "once a year" to "every second RIPE meeting" in case > the number of RIPE meetings per year changes or one of them gets > cancelled say because the Kras catches fire. And while the selection > process may well be aligned with a RIPE meeting,

Re: [dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure

2015-01-11 Thread Jim Reid
On 7 Jan 2015, at 20:15, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 06/01/2015 12:41, Niall O'Reilly wrote: >> [2] A co-chair will serve a term of N years, where N is the number >> of co-chairs. Terms will be staggered so that one term expires every >> year. > > This is also semantically non-deterministic in