> On 6 Jan 2015, at 12:41, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
>
> At Mon, 5 Jan 2015 17:33:48 +,
> Jim Reid wrote:
>>
>> Happy new year everyone.
>
> +1!
>
> I suggest replacing these paragraphs
>
>> [2] A co-chair will serve a term of N years, where N is the number
>> of co-chairs. Terms will be s
At Mon, 5 Jan 2015 17:33:48 +,
Jim Reid wrote:
>
> Happy new year everyone.
+1!
I suggest replacing these paragraphs
> [2] A co-chair will serve a term of N years, where N is the number
> of co-chairs. Terms will be staggered so that one term expires every
> year. A co-chair cannot serv
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 05:33:48PM +, Jim Reid wrote:
Dear All
> One sticking point appears to be the "A co-chair cannot serve more than 2
> consecutive terms." provision in [2]. Someone commented at the mike at RIPE69
> that this was a good thing. One of your co-chairs says the opposite. E
I strongly support the proposal that a WG Chair serves a term of N years
and also cannot serve more than 2 consecutive terms, I also agree with
Nick that adding something into the language to make it clear that a
previous chair can be re-elected following a set period would be a good
move.
Brett C
