Re: [dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure

2015-01-05 Thread Peter Koch
Jim, all, On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 05:33:48PM +, Jim Reid wrote: > One sticking point appears to be the "A co-chair cannot serve more than 2 > consecutive terms." provision in [2]. Someone commented at the mike at RIPE69 > that this was a good thing. One of your co-chairs says the opposite.

Re: [dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure

2015-01-05 Thread Nick Hilliard
Jim, On 05/01/2015 17:33, Jim Reid wrote: > One sticking point appears to be the "A co-chair cannot serve more than > 2 consecutive terms." provision in [2]. Someone commented at the mike > at RIPE69 that this was a good thing. One of your co-chairs says the > opposite. Everyone else has not com

[dns-wg] yet another heave on the WG Chair selection procedure

2015-01-05 Thread Jim Reid
Happy new year everyone. The list has been silent about the draft selection procedure. This means it's not possible to decide if there's a consensus or not so we can declare victory and move on. Sigh. Could I ask you all to review the proposal and comment on the list? One sticking point appear