Re: [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors

2014-11-17 Thread Patrik Wallstrom
Hi all, On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, David Conrad wrote: > Romeo, > > On Nov 17, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Romeo Zwart wrote: > > 2/ The RIPE NCC has been publishing this key material out of band for > > historical reasons. If there is a consensus in the WG that this is no > > longer needed, or even undesirabl

Re: [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors

2014-11-17 Thread David Conrad
Romeo, On Nov 17, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Romeo Zwart wrote: > 2/ The RIPE NCC has been publishing this key material out of band for > historical reasons. If there is a consensus in the WG that this is no > longer needed, or even undesirable, we are happy to phase out the use of > the DLV. Yay! > 3/

Re: [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors

2014-11-17 Thread Romeo Zwart
Dear Collegues, Our message from last Thursday (see https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/2014-November/002981.html) has stirred a significant amount of discussion. Trying to summarize the responses on the mailing list, I came to the below list of topics: /1 Why does any zone under 62.in