this solution makes sense, the draft will be published after the
IETF meeting.
BR,
Zhiwei Yan
2015-03-11
<>___
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
quest message.
BR,
2015-03-11
Zhiwei Yan
发件人： W.C.A. Wijngaards
发送时间： 2015-03-11 15:31:15
收件人： dns-privacy
抄送：
主题： Re: [dns-privacy] Encrypt the signalings between stub and
recursiveresolvers under UDP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Zhiwei Yan,
On 03/11/2015 04:
draft
can make use of them to authenticate the client.
Best Regards,
Zhiwei Yan
> 在 2015年3月20日，上午12:02，Paul Wouters 写道：
>
>> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, W.C.A. Wijngaards wrote:
>>
>> Could perhaps a different algorithm, like ED25519, provide better
>> performance, and
Hi, all,
Then why not consider the DHCP?
DHCP can support client authentication and can be used to configure the RS key
on the authenticated client.
Do you think this will help?
Zhiwei Yan
2015-04-14
Zhiwei Yan
发件人： Daniel Migault
发送时间： 2015-04-14 07:20:47
收件人： Paul Wouters
抄送： dns
RFC 3118 provides a scheme for this issue:
http://www.rfc-base.org/txt/rfc-3118.txt
2015-04-14
Zhiwei Yan
发件人： Paul Wouters
发送时间： 2015-04-14 11:04:58
收件人： Zhiwei Yan
抄送： dns-privacy
主题： Re: [dns-privacy] Considering DHCP
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Zhiwei Yan wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
+1
Best Regards,
Zhiwei Yan
> 在 2015年4月14日，下午5:46，Linhui Sun 写道：
>
> HI, Daniel
>
> I think there is no difference when we considering which to do first. If the
> DHCP could offer a better way, that would be fine. However, there are several
> problems in the aut
We should solve two problems:
1) trust problem
2) encryption problem
No matter whether we adopt DHCP, it's better to solve them separately. I mean
that it's OK if two solutions are used for these two problems.
Best Regards,
Zhiwei Yan
> 在 2015年4月14日，下午5:46，Linhui Sun 写道：
>
>
