On 15. Aug 2022, at 17:11, Ted Lemon wrote:
>
> This is a good question. I think we’d want to understand what the actual use
> case is for DNS-over-CoAP before proceeding with this,
The main use case is systems that already implement CoAP and do not want to add
machinery for some protocols tha
On 15. Aug 2022, at 19:41, Ted Lemon wrote:
>
>> On Aug 15, 2022, at 1:34 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>>
>> On 15. Aug 2022, at 17:11, Ted Lemon wrote:
>>>
>>> This is a good question. I think we’d want to understand what the actual
>>> use
I think we are falling into the restatement antipattern. This antipattern happens when documents restate mandates from their references, invariably creating confusion if this is just a restatement or actually new normative text that replaces or updates text from the dependency. Don’t do that. Examp
On 2023-07-07, at 09:26, Esko Dijk wrote:
>
> In the last interim meeting presentation “security” was a key driver for this
> draft. Which is a very good one; compared to non-secured DNS as the
> alternative.
>
> Firmware size and code complexity/BOM are also relevant if this protocol can
>
