Re: [dns-operations] NS answer inconsistency between implementations for delegated zone

2012-03-16 Thread RijilV
On 16 March 2012 06:54, Tony Finch wrote: > Remi Gacogne wrote: >> >> I noticed a difference in the behavior of bind, powerdns (using bind or >> MySQL backend) and nsd regarding the answer to an NS query for a >> delegated zone. Powerdns is responding to the query by putting >> corresponding NS R

Re: [dns-operations] NS answer inconsistency between implementations for delegated zone

2012-03-16 Thread RijilV
On 16 March 2012 09:47, Tony Finch wrote: > RijilV wrote: >> >> Could you help me understand how you understood that every answer >> containing the NS RRs for the query zone should be in the AUTHORITY >> rather than in the ANSWER regardless if it is the answer to th

Re: [dns-operations] "Authoritative Name Server" at Wikipedia

2012-08-08 Thread RijilV
On 8 August 2012 15:08, Michael Hoskins (michoski) wrote: > PPS: Best practice suggestion -- don't name products after well understood > industry terms. :-( You mean like windows :P that seems to be working out pretty well for them... .r' ___ dns-ope

Re: [dns-operations] getting .CW recognised in the Google ccTLD tables/databases ...

2013-01-20 Thread RijilV
My experience is many people use Mozilla's public suffix list for allowing folks to create resources on their app services. This is because a large number of TLDs don't support creating records directly off of them, and the 3rd parties don't want to accidentally grant ownership to a higher namespa