Hello DNS experts,
I were thinking about requirements for future name resolution primarily
on Linux desktop and servers. But if anyone could comment other systems
and their design, I would be glad too. I would like to formulate
requirements first and find a good way to implement them later.
--- Begin Message ---
I am very glad somebody is asking these questions. They're food for thought
and go beyond strict DNS/53 (not that it IS 53 any more, so I mean "old
school dns as protocols") to the wider question of name to locator mapping
in a multiple service context, and the fracture of a
I think those are good questions, I don't have a lot of unqualified
opinions and less answers.
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022, Petr Menšík wrote:
I were thinking about requirements for future name resolution primarily on
Linux desktop and servers.
Ok. I don't like what systemd is doing, overall. I don't
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 09:16:11PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote:
> - first is libc interface getaddrinfo() provided by nss plugins. Names
> can be resolved also by different protocols than just DNS. A good
> examples might be MDNS (RFC 6762), LLMNR (RFC 4795) or Samba
> (nmblookup). Standardized ca
