On 3/31/15, 13:49, "Paul Vixie" wrote:
> the descendant's apex NS TTL has a higher credibility.
A nit - RFC 2181 uses trustworthiness, not credibility. I had to "fix"
that in my discussions on the topic. (Trying to stem terminology creep.)
>if you have an alternative in mind that uses some ot
On Mar 27, 2015, at 8:48 AM, Mike Jones wrote:
> Comments? Ideas? Does someone want to make a slightly more formal
> proposal for what such a protocol should look like?
In the responses so far, I have not seen people give one of the earlier-stated
reasons why such a protocol might be bad: it can
