A lot of people do not realize that the RNAME address is behind their
anti-spam solution too. This could explain the low volume of spam being
received. And it is not like you would receive the report of a spam email
at this address (unlike abuse@).
an abuse handle should be present in the domain w
On 12/10/2012 06:46 AM, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:
If anyone has any actual evidence of SOA data being used for spam I'd love to
see it ..
I've been party to floods of spam arriving at various
hostmaster@ addresses, but I think that had everything to do
with that specific address (a
On Dec 10, 2012, at 9:46, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:
> If anyone has any actual evidence of SOA data being used for spam I'd love to
> see it ..
Reading this thread and replying in general, no one is claiming that the RNAME
leads to spam, it's that one (one!) of the old spouse's tale
-Original Message-
From: Chris Thompson
Reply-To: "c...@cam.ac.uk"
Date: Monday, December 10, 2012 9:40 AM
To: Joe Abley
Cc: DNS Operations List
Subject: Re: [dns-operations] email address in SOA
>On Dec 6 2012, Joe Abley wrote, in re the SOA.rname field:
>
>>
From: dns-operations-boun...@lists.dns-oarc.net
[dns-operations-boun...@lists.dns-oarc.net] on behalf of Chris Thompson
[c...@cam.ac.uk]
Sent: 10 December 2012 14:40
To: Joe Abley
Cc: DNS Operations List
Subject: Re: [dns-operations] email address in SOA
On Dec 6 2012, Joe Abley wrote,
On Dec 6 2012, Joe Abley wrote, in re the SOA.rname field:
It's used for
(a) legitimate operational communication with a zone maintainer, and
(b) source data for people harvesting addresses in order to send spam.
Since the e-mail resulting from (b) greatly outnumbers the e-mail resulting
from
On 2012-12-05, at 20:24, Feng He wrote:
> for the soa record, i.e,
> google.com. 43199 IN SOA ns1.google.com.
> dns-admin.google.com. 2012113000 7200 1800 1209600 300
>
> Though I know dns-admin.google.com is an email address standing for
> dns-ad...@google.com
>
> I h
On 2012-12-06 at 10:57 +0200, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
> On 06.12.12 06:29, Phil Pennock wrote:
> > Gmail offers what was, at the time they introduced it, an _unusual_
> > canonicalisation, which may have become more widespread now. It makes
> > a lot of sense. Gmail says that, for mail to one of th
On 06.12.12 06:29, Phil Pennock wrote:
Gmail offers what was, at the time they introduced it, an _unusual_
canonicalisation, which may have become more widespread now. It makes
a lot of sense. Gmail says that, for mail to one of their domains,
dots are not significant and canonicalise away. T
On 2012-12-05 at 20:32 -0500, Andrew Latham wrote:
> It is informational only and often unchecked or audited by
> organizations. The purpose is to discuss DNS related issues with the
> DNS admin and dots in email user names are considered a wild card and
> would simply be compacted so foo@goog
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Feng He wrote:
> Hello,
>
> for the soa record, i.e,
> google.com. 43199 IN SOA ns1.google.com.
> dns-admin.google.com. 2012113000 7200 1800 1209600 300
>
> Though I know dns-admin.google.com is an email address standing for
> dns-ad...@google
It would be written foo\.bar.gmail.com since the first dot shown is inside a
label.
Feng He wrote:
>Hello,
>
>for the soa record, i.e,
>google.com. 43199 IN SOA ns1.google.com.
>dns-admin.google.com. 2012113000 7200 1800 1209600 300
>
>Though I know dns-admin.google.com
12 matches
Mail list logo
