Re: [dns-operations] Tor and the answers > 512 bytes

2014-05-13 Thread David Dagon
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 08:12:05PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > Doing proper DNS resolution, including returning the entire dnssec chain > back to the client on resolves, would be nice. Somebody should do it. :) Based on CCC talks, I believe the Tor community is considering an unbound-based

Re: [dns-operations] Tor and the answers > 512 bytes

2014-05-13 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Tue, 13 May 2014, Hauke Lampe wrote: > On 13.05.2014 18:25, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > > It appears that Tor is still limited to 512 bytes / no TCP :-( > > Indeed, the restricted set of query types offered by libevent also > prevents SRV lookups for XMPP. > Someone[tm] should rewrite Tor

Re: [dns-operations] Tor and the answers > 512 bytes

2014-05-13 Thread Paul Wouters
On Tue, 13 May 2014, Hauke Lampe wrote: On 13.05.2014 18:25, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: It appears that Tor is still limited to 512 bytes / no TCP :-( Indeed, the restricted set of query types offered by libevent also prevents SRV lookups for XMPP. Someone[tm] should rewrite Tor's resolver

Re: [dns-operations] Tor and the answers > 512 bytes

2014-05-13 Thread Hauke Lampe
On 13.05.2014 18:25, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > It appears that Tor is still limited to 512 bytes / no TCP :-( Indeed, the restricted set of query types offered by libevent also prevents SRV lookups for XMPP. Someone[tm] should rewrite Tor's resolver to use libunbound ;-) Hauke. ___