In message <21657.50339.776956.915...@tale.kendall.corp.akamai.com>, David C La
wrence writes:
> Paul Hoffman writes:
> > That is, is there really a reason for starting the cache
> > with a query for ". IN NS" instead of just "whatever IN A"?
>
> You get a current list of the root servers instead
Paul Hoffman writes:
> That is, is there really a reason for starting the cache
> with a query for ". IN NS" instead of just "whatever IN A"?
You get a current list of the root servers instead of the list of the
whatever servers?
___
dns-operations maili
On Dec 23, 2014, at 2:43 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
>
> Davey Song wrote:
>>
>> But I do not find any specification on the priming process of resolver,
>
> There is a draft
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming
That long-expired draft says:
A priming query SHOULD use
I guess that might because I don't wipe out the cache rightly. I use
"rec_control wipe-cache ."
to wipe out the cache for root server. Does this will clear the cache rightly?
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:38 PM, bert hubert
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:08:39AM +0800, Davey Song wrote:
> > I
Davey Song wrote:
>
> But I do not find any specification on the priming process of resolver,
There is a draft
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
Portland, Plymouth: Southwest 5 to 7. Rough or very rough. Occasional drizz
Thanks for your comment, Mark. Yes, I know it‘s OK, because the NS RRset
and Glue of root server rarely change.
But I do not find any specification on the priming process of resolver, so
I do the test and post on the mailing list hoping to discuss and find how
priming woks in implementations an
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:08:39AM +0800, Davey Song wrote:
> I am doing a test on priming exchange from different DNS software’s and
> find something weird. BIND(v9.8.1, v9.9.4, v9.10.1 ) would send NS query
> and a query simultaneously rather than wait until NS query get answered.
> PowerDNS(v3.3
In message
, Davey Song writes:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am doing a test on priming exchange from different DNS softwareâs and
> find something weird. BIND(v9.8.1, v9.9.4, v9.10.1 ) would send NS query
> and a query simultaneously rather than wait until NS query get answered.
> PowerDNS(v3.3) will not