In message <0e2a12fc-3b99-4486-bc89-ac12097eb...@linkedin.com>, Franck Martin
writes:
> On Dec 15, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Keith Mitchell wrote:
>
> > On 12/14/2014 11:45 AM, Keith Mitchell wrote:
> >> On 12/13/2014 04:30 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >>>
> >>> OARC's DNS Reply Size Test Server is not EDN
On Dec 15, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Keith Mitchell wrote:
> On 12/14/2014 11:45 AM, Keith Mitchell wrote:
>> On 12/13/2014 04:30 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>>
>>> OARC's DNS Reply Size Test Server is not EDNS compliant. It does
>>> not return a OPT record to EDNS requests. This causes named from
>>>
On 12/14/2014 11:45 AM, Keith Mitchell wrote:
> On 12/13/2014 04:30 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>
>> OARC's DNS Reply Size Test Server is not EDNS compliant. It does
>> not return a OPT record to EDNS requests. This causes named from
>> BIND 9.10.0 and later to classify the servers as not EDNS
>>
On 12/13/2014 04:30 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> OARC's DNS Reply Size Test Server is not EDNS compliant. It does
> not return a OPT record to EDNS requests. This causes named from
> BIND 9.10.0 and later to classify the servers as not EDNS compliant
> and to only send plain DNS queries. This in
OARC's DNS Reply Size Test Server is not EDNS compliant. It does
not return a OPT record to EDNS requests. This causes named from
BIND 9.10.0 and later to classify the servers as not EDNS compliant
and to only send plain DNS queries. This in turn results in bug
reports saying we fail the test w
