Re: [dns-operations] Google Resolver Validation

2015-04-01 Thread Yunhong Gu
This should be fixed now. Sorry that this was not a April Fools day joke :) Yunhong On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Yunhong Gu wrote: > Thanks, I am investigating. > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Brett wrote: > >> 1 gw-vlan100 (213.248.204.1) 0.512 ms 0.320

Re: [dns-operations] CloudFlare policy on ANY records changing

2015-03-10 Thread Yunhong Gu
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > In message < > cagmqtqjrpx_xg_ojtshsw5yqaefkzwdma16xw7iry9pr0_f...@mail.gmail.com> > , Yunhong Gu writes: > > > > Returning NOTIMP may confuse resolvers as it is not clear "what is not > >

Re: [dns-operations] CloudFlare policy on ANY records changing

2015-03-09 Thread Yunhong Gu
Returning NOTIMP may confuse resolvers as it is not clear "what is not implemented". A NOTIMP response to an ANY query with EDNS0 option could cause a retry-without-EDNS0 query, or mislead the resolver to believe that the nameserver does not support EDNS0. Yunhong On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:10 PM,

Re: [dns-operations] Google Public DNS

2012-10-02 Thread Yunhong Gu
Hi, Adam I am on the team of Google Public DNS. Thanks for the report. We will check Australia related service. (No, this is definitely not intentional). You can also open a ticket here (https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/groups) if the problem persists. Thanks Yunhong On Tue, Oct 2,