except for all those filter rules that add points if your reverse DNS
looks like a dynamic IP? ;-)
--
Jo Rhett
+1 (415) 999-1798
Skype: jorhett
Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet projects.
Author of
- Learning MCollective: http://shop.oreilly.com/product/06
ernon Schryverv...@rhyolite.com
> _______
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
> dns-jobs mailing list
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/l
cated behavior for more than 20 years now. And yes, if you use
a canonical name pointer at the far side of an @ sign, it should be rewritten
to the domain it is pointing at. That is exactly that DNS and straightforward
English indicates.
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : net philanthropy to impr
ave bought their own pain.
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet projects.
Author of Instant Puppet 3 Starter:
http://www.netconsonance.com/instant-puppet-3-starter-book/
___
dns-operations mailing list
resolver, you should
lose your tech cred and go work at a grocery store if you can't.
We need to make stupidity hurt them, not make it easier for them to do, and
easier for their stupidity to hurt us.
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet proje
se
> E-mail: rod.rasmus...@internetidentity.com
> Office: +1.253.590.4088
> ___
> dns-operations mailing list
> dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
> dns-jobs mailing
uh? Glad we don't do any
business with you.
> I don't see these recursive requests as much different than spam
In the case of DNS requests I agree that dropping requests that are improper
makes sense. There's no human sitting there wondering why they didn't ge
and let him explain why this isn't whack-a-mole.
Discuss precedence and the conservative nature of judges and most juries. Why a
few good judgements soil the pan for everyone.
This isn't my legal theory. This is what I've observed used very successfully
in the courtroom, and hav
> On 23/02/2013, at 2:53 AM, Jo Rhett wrote:
>> No. I've had this conversation many times and employees of big companies
>> feel that it's impossible, and don't even raise the issue with their
>> management. In two different occasions I arranged a meeting wi
On Feb 22, 2013, at 7:38 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> i do not disagree with bcp38. i just don't think repeating that anyone
> who does not deploy it is an anti-internet asshole is going to get any
> more significent deployment. that approach has been failing for many
> years.
I think that their nat
On Feb 22, 2013, at 2:09 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
Civil lawsuits by victims of DNS reflection and other attacks that
depend on failures to deploy BCP38 might help convince boards of
directors.
>> Having been a witness in two of these lawsuits,
>
> cites, please
That's a great request
On Feb 22, 2013, at 12:04 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> Civil lawsuits by victims of DNS reflection and other attacks that
>> depend on failures to deploy BCP38 might help convince boards of
>> directors.
>
> as will black helicopters. can we stick to reality as we actually experience
> it?
Having
On Feb 22, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
> - big companies with staff who care about BCP38 have likely already deployed
> it;
No. I've had this conversation many times and employees of big companies feel
that it's impossible, and don't even raise the issue with their management. In
two d
On Feb 22, 2013, at 10:19 AM, Jim Reid wrote:
> There's no point arguing the semantics of "don't" and "can't". As Paul
> mentioned earlier, let's remain realistic. Universal deployment of BCP38
> simply isn't going to happen, no matter how much you or I *really want* that.
> [And I do.] Get ove
On Feb 22, 2013, at 4:04 AM, Paul Vixie wrote:
> at which point it's easier to fix source address validation and make THAT
> universal. which we already know can't be done.
Don't confuse "won't" with "can't". It absolutely can be done. It won't be done
because the carriers see profit in lazines
15 matches
Mail list logo
