Re: [dns-operations] differ

2023-11-13 Thread Keith Mitchell
On 11/12/23 13:07, Randy Bush wrote: it occurred to me that it migh tme wise to have a rancid like (https://shrubbery.net/rancid/) equivalent for critical domains. i.e. to git record changes and warn of radical diffs. is there any foss tooling in this space? It's not exactly what you are looki

Re: [dns-operations] differ

2023-11-13 Thread Paul Lettington
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023, at 13:03, Randy Bush wrote: > why reinvent rancid? i use it and like it a lot. but, as joe says, > it's perl; i.e. it will not be pleasant to augment. occasionally i have > to touch one of the ancient perl bits around here, and ugh. Oxidized[0] is a RANCID replacement and i

Re: [dns-operations] differ

2023-11-13 Thread cstamas+dns
On 11/13/23 12:35, cstamas+...@cstamas.hu wrote: > hi, > Nov 13, 2023 11:26:15 Matthew Richardson : > [...] >> which runs as a daily job via cron.  Obviously, this only does the >> recording into a git repo, but does not do any alerting > For alerting and stopping a zone before XFR to secondaries

Re: [dns-operations] differ

2023-11-13 Thread cstamas+dns
hi, Nov 13, 2023 11:26:15 Matthew Richardson : > Randy Bush wrote:- > >> it occurred to me that it migh tme wise to have a rancid like >> (https://shrubbery.net/rancid/) equivalent for critical domains. >> i.e. to git record changes and warn of radical diffs. >> >> is there any foss tooling in t

Re: [dns-operations] differ

2023-11-13 Thread Randy Bush
>> it occurred to me that it migh tme wise to have a rancid like >> (https://shrubbery.net/rancid/) equivalent for critical domains. >> i.e. to git record changes and warn of radical diffs. >> >> is there any foss tooling in this space? > > Assuming there isn't - yet...- What would you want a too

Re: [dns-operations] differ

2023-11-13 Thread Joe Abley
On 12 Nov 2023, at 19:58, Randy Bush wrote: > it occurred to me that it migh tme wise to have a rancid like > (https://shrubbery.net/rancid/) equivalent for critical domains. > i.e. to git record changes and warn of radical diffs. > > is there any foss tooling in this space? It seems like it o

Re: [dns-operations] differ

2023-11-13 Thread Phil Regnauld
sth...@nethelp.no (sthaug) writes: > > Assuming there isn't - yet...- What would you want a tool like this > > to do ? Would a simple diff (e.g.: number of deleted lines > X, > > assuming one is working with files) be too vague ? Would you want the > > granularity to be RRsets ? >

Re: [dns-operations] differ

2023-11-13 Thread Matthew Richardson via dns-operations
--- Begin Message --- Randy Bush wrote:- >it occurred to me that it migh tme wise to have a rancid like >(https://shrubbery.net/rancid/) equivalent for critical domains. >i.e. to git record changes and warn of radical diffs. > >is there any foss tooling in this space? For the recording, I do som

Re: [dns-operations] differ

2023-11-13 Thread sthaug
>> it occurred to me that it migh tme wise to have a rancid like >> (https://shrubbery.net/rancid/) equivalent for critical domains. >> i.e. to git record changes and warn of radical diffs. >> >> is there any foss tooling in this space? > > Assuming there isn't - yet...- What would you want

Re: [dns-operations] differ

2023-11-13 Thread Phil Regnauld
Randy Bush (randy) writes: > it occurred to me that it migh tme wise to have a rancid like > (https://shrubbery.net/rancid/) equivalent for critical domains. > i.e. to git record changes and warn of radical diffs. > > is there any foss tooling in this space? Assuming there isn't - yet...-

Re: [dns-operations] differ

2023-11-13 Thread Gihan Dias
On 2023-11-12 23:37, Randy Bush wrote: it occurred to me that it migh tme wise to have a rancid like (https://shrubbery.net/rancid/) equivalent for critical domains. i.e. to git record changes and warn of radical diffs. Randy, Yes. This would be useful, and we (.LK) would like to have it. Gih