Moin!
> On 24 Sep 2014, at 18:27, Davey Song wrote:
>
> Hi everyone, I‘m recently doing a little survey on the penetration of IPv6 in
> DNS system and it's latent problems.
Can you tell me what the problem is? Even if you are on an IPv6 only network
your resolver (that you reach over v6) proba
Hi everyone, I‘m recently doing a little survey on the penetration of IPv6
in DNS system and it's latent problems.
I find that top websites like Google, Wikipedia,Yahoo already support IPv6
access, but its name servers are still IPv4-only. I'm wondering why? is
there any operation consideration or
A reminder DNS-OARC's 2014 Fall Workshop and Member AGM will be taking
place in Los Angeles, California, USA on the 11th through 13th October,
and we are pleased to announce a very strong confirmed agenda at:
https://indico.dns-oarc.net//conferenceTimeTable.py?confId=20#all.detailed
This will be
On Sep 25, 2014, at 1:46 AM, Franck Martin wrote:
But what about the customers that use recursive nameservers, does it make
sense for them to block fragments at the edge and even on the other side of
the link at the edge?
No, no, no. They'll break the Internet if they do that.
My point was in
On Sep 23, 2014, at 2:34 PM, Roland Dobbins wrote:
>
> On Sep 24, 2014, at 12:16 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> Fragmentation in IPv4 is inherently insecure.
>
> Conceptually, yes, it's a Very Bad Idea. But given the realities of the
> TCP/IP we have, it's important that network operators
