In message , Randy Bush writes:
>
> > # dig +short txt berlin
> > ;; Truncated, retrying in TCP mode.
> > "The .berlin-zone is protected through the German Copyright-Law. " "Beyond
> it
> > is protected by criminal law and data protection law. " "Unauthorised entry
> to
> > the zone is prohibit
On Sa, 11 Jan 2014 at 11:35:55 +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> > # dig +short txt berlin
> > ;; Truncated, retrying in TCP mode.
> > "The .berlin-zone is protected through the German Copyright-Law. " "Beyond
> > it
> > is protected by criminal law and data protection law. " "Unauthorised entry
> > to
Take a breath - or let the compliance jihad begin:
ninja. 0 IN TYPE65534 \# 5 08D7050001
ninja. 0 IN TYPE65534 \# 5 0818510001
Isn't that a bind private RR type keeping the state of auto signing?
I vaguelt remember
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 08:49:15AM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> >From an operations point of view, this TXT is problematic in that it shows
> >that the zone operator is willing to break its agreement with ICANN without
> >notice. They agreed to only put the following in the TLD zone:
> ? Ap
>From an operations point of view, this TXT is problematic in that it shows
>that the zone operator is willing to break its agreement with ICANN without
>notice. They agreed to only put the following in the TLD zone:
• Apex SOA record.
• Apex NS records and in-bailiwick glue for t
