On 23.10.13 22:17, Haya Shulman wrote:
Sorry for the brief description earlier, fyi, a slightly more
elaborate design:
The idea is to replace a single middle fragment, e.g., given n
fragments, for n>2, we replace some fragment, s.t., 1< i < n.
Assume n=3 (and also assume, for simplicity, that
Just a quick followup
After reading Vernon's suggestion back when this thread was current, I
enacted TXT :v=DMARC1;p=none;pct=100:
finally, taken nearly a month, but they have stopped :)
On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 08:06 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-09-29 at 03:53 -0400, Jim Popovitch wro
> From: Haya Shulman
> > I'm puzzled by the explanation of Socket Overloading in
> > https://sites.google.com/site/hayashulman/files/NIC-derandomisation.pdf
> > I understand it to say that Linux on a 3 GHz CPU receiving 25,000
> > packets/second (500 bytes @ 100 Mbit/sec) spends so much time in
>
On Oct 23, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Rick Wesson wrote:
> Does ICANN have a root-zone announce list? I remember hearing about it being
> developed, but can't locate the list subscribe.
Here's how I found out about it:
http://blog.icann.org/2013/10/first-new-gtlds-get-the-green-light-for-delegation/
> I'm puzzled by the explanation of Socket Overloading in
> https://sites.google.com/site/hayashulman/files/NIC-derandomisation.pdf
> I understand it to say that Linux on a 3 GHz CPU receiving 25,000
> packets/second (500 bytes @ 100 Mbit/sec) spends so much time in
> interrupt code that low level
Kim Davies (kim.davies) writes:
> For the root zone, it would be good to get some feedback on what level of
> granularity of notifications would be most useful. There is a spectrum of
> notifications possible — we could notify of every change in the root zone and
> root zone database, which woul
On Oct 23, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Rick Wesson
mailto:r...@support-intelligence.com>> wrote:
Does ICANN have a root-zone announce list? I remember hearing about it being
developed, but can't locate the list subscribe.
We don't have a list yet, partly because we have a number of new notification
ser
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 04:01:09PM -0400, Edward Lewis wrote:
> My sensors show 4 new gTLDs in the last hour or so...IDN, non-ccTLD...added
> between 1800 and 1900 UTC.
-. 86400 IN SOA a.root-servers.net.
nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2013102300 1800 900 604800 86400
+.
Hi Ed,
At 13:01 23-10-2013, Edward Lewis wrote:
My sensors show 4 new gTLDs in the last hour or so...IDN,
non-ccTLD...added between 1800 and 1900 UTC.
http://blog.icann.org/2013/10/first-new-gtlds-get-the-green-light-for-delegation/
Regards,
-sm
_
Rick-
This also may be helpful from an advanced preparation standpoint, which may
be more practical for yours and others on the list purposes:
http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gtldnotification/
They send an announce upon contracting so that folks can get an advance
notice on upcoming strings pre-de
Edward
Yes - they've been delegated:
http://blog.blacknight.com/new-tlds-almost.html
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Domains
http://www.blacknight.co/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://www.technology.ie
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Locall: 1850 9
On Oct 23, 2013, at 16:11, Rick Wesson wrote:
> Does ICANN have a root-zone announce list? I remember hearing about it being
> developed, but can't locate the list subscribe.
I don't believe it does, although I remember Kim Davies telling me it was on
his list of things to set up. Signalling
Ed,
ICANN put up a blog post about this earlier today at:
http://blog.icann.org/2013/10/dawn-of-a-new-internet-era/
after putting one up on Monday saying the delegation had been requested:
http://blog.icann.org/2013/10/first-new-gtlds-get-the-green-light-for-delegation/
ICANN also issued a new
ICANN blogged about this and made the announcement in Bali at the IGF
very early this a.m.
They weren't there when I looked earlier, thanks for the heads up!
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Edward Lewis wrote:
> My sensors show 4 new gTLDs in the last hour or so...IDN, non-ccTLD...added
> betwe
Does ICANN have a root-zone announce list? I remember hearing about it
being developed, but can't locate the list subscribe.
-rick
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Edward Lewis wrote:
> My sensors show 4 new gTLDs in the last hour or so...IDN,
> non-ccTLD...added between 1800 and 1900 UTC.
>
My sensors show 4 new gTLDs in the last hour or so...IDN, non-ccTLD...added
between 1800 and 1900 UTC.
Anyone else see this?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis
NeuStarYou can leave a voice message at +1-571-43
>
> I see I'm stupid for not seeing that in the first message. I did search
> for 'http' but somehow didn't see the URL. But why not simply repeat
> the URL for people like me? Why not the URL of the paper at the
> beginning instead of a list of papers?
> https://sites.google.com/site/hayashulman/f
Nice work Brian and the CZ folks!
Although you and me talked about this at CNS, but it was too stressed in
time, so I have few questions:
1. Which resolvers (and versions) did you run the attack against?
2. Which responses' type (and records) did you try to poison? e.g.,
referral, answer, NXDOMAIN
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
> Haya Shulman wrote:
>
>
>
>> > > so if i add "first weaponized by Haya Shulman" this would settle the
>> > > matter?
>> >
>> > Thank you, can you please use Amir Herzberg and Haya Shulman (I
>> > collaborated on this attack together with my p
Paul Vixie wrote:
Haya Shulman wrote:
> > so if i add "first weaponized by Haya Shulman" this would settle the
> > matter?
>
> Thank you, can you please use Amir Herzberg and Haya Shulman (I
> collaborated on this attack together with my phd advisor Amir Herzberg).
it shall be done.
Thank you.
20 matches
Mail list logo
