On Tue, Feb 25, 2020, at 3:28 AM, Didier Kryn wrote:
> Le 25/02/2020 à 09:05, Steve Litt a écrit :
> > On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:21:16 +
> > Daniel Abrecht via Dng wrote:
> ...
> >> Without dbus, applications & daemons could do similar things using
> >> unix sockets. ...
>
> Yep, socket, si
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020, at 4:34 AM, Dan Purgert wrote:
> On Mar 02, 2020, spiralofhope wrote:
> That is certainly some Orwellian thinking right there.
You say "Orwellian thinking" like it's a bad thing. :)
DD
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https:/
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020, at 2:18 PM, Florian Zieboll wrote:
>
> Which leads to an even deeper question: As we tend to move into the
> direction we look (think of learning a header or somersault or perhaps
> also of getting through a dangerous situation when driving a vehicle) -
> what does this mean f
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020, at 9:42 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting tekHedd (tekh...@byteheaven.net):
>
> > Re this thread, clearly a multi-user system with a GUI does need
> > polkit and /some/ sort of dbus mechanism (which I will henceforth
> > refer to as the "dbus mecha
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020, at 12:51 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 02:09:37PM +0100, Didier Kryn wrote:
> > Le 03/03/2020 à 23:37, tekHedd a écrit :
> > >
> > > So, I would consider rewriting polkit and dbus from scratch.
> > >
> > >
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, at 5:37 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting tekHedd (tekh...@byteheaven.net):
>
> > Cool software doesn't really happen without the ability for apps to
> > communicate and read/write the state of the system and communicate
> > with other user level co
