[DNG] Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity.

2017-07-29 Thread nisus
It has come to my attention that some entities are claiming that you, dear Linux Hackers, (1)need to go through some foundation or get some permission from upon high in-order to sue the progenitors of GRSecurity for their violation of section 6 of the terms underwhich the linux kernel is distri

Re: [DNG] MikeeUSA warning (Re: Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity.)

2017-07-30 Thread nisus
First of all, give some proof of your accusation. Second of all, prove the relevance of such. Third of all: identity politics is off-topic in a discussion on copyright. Is it not you, thus, who is trolling and attempting to derail the conversation? On 2017-07-29 16:52, Adam Borowski wrote:

[DNG] Yes I am an attorney. - Re: Identity of OP (Software written by contractors and the 'work for hire') concept

2017-08-01 Thread nisus
Yes I am a licensed attorney. No I am not going to give you my registration number nor am I going to show you my bar card. I'm sure you will keep on libeling me... All my legal analysis has been correct however, you might ponder why that is so... Rick Moen and Adam Borowski: I am a licensed

Re: [DNG] Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity - Two options that can be used in concert or separately.

2017-08-01 Thread nisus
Thank you Mr. Rankin for saying this. Bruce Perens blocked me* (also calling me a "fool" later to a 3rd party) after I started to brainstorm the defenses that would be raised about a week or two ago: letting everyone in the world know what he thought of me for mentioning laches etc. Such talk