free software force and golinux have expressed interest in a revised version of
the four freedoms, which i was initially very shy about the idea of. for some
time ive proposed as an alternative a list of companion qualities or "pillars"
which i havent completely abandoned yet.
still, while seek
> Let me just kindly ask you to restrict the habit of numbering
things starting from 0 to programming in C (and derived languages). In
these languages it is a trick to map array indexes to address
arithmetic; out of this scope it makes no sense.
the scope it makes sense in is that the first f
Steve Litt said:
>
> An init system is not an isolated component, but is deeply integrated
> in the core layer of the system and affects many packages.
>
> Ummm, the preceding
Steve Litt wrote:
> Not Gentoo --- they're slowly sliding toward systemd.
this is important to me, and ive looked for more information on the gentoo
forums and website, and i cant find the trend.
ive admired your criticism of systemd for a long time:
http://techrights.org/wiki/index.php/Libret
g4sra wrote:
> FOSS and the FSF have not lived up to my expectations, my fault for expecting
> too much.
> I am now pinning my hopes on the future growth of FFS (Five Freedoms
> Software).
glad to have you aboard, g4sra.
i believe jaromil likes this as well, i certainly dont expect him to pr
> Since you mention that, I'm really surprised you managed to write a
long, long screed on that subject that nowhere even mentions
Montesquieu.
> (Of course, your concern wasn't about government structure but rather,
er, some highly abstract, yet very verbose, ideological point.)
gee rick, ive
steve, it was appreciated in any event, and probably intended to help people on
the list.
i intended my earlier post to be under the proper subject, but forgot to edit
it. not that i havent already been careful about that, but i missed that one.
___
Dn
