On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 6:10 PM Patrick Bartek via Dng
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:34:32 +0200
> Alessandro Vesely via Dng wrote:
>
> > On Tue 15/Jun/2021 20:41:09 +0200 Patrick Bartek via Dng wrote:
> > >
> > > I have found that each desktop uses its own method of automounting.
> > > PCMan
On Sat 26/Jun/2021 11:45:46 +0200 o1bigtenor wrote:
so you're suggesting the use of
# apt update
# apt full-grade
or is that
# apt full-upgrade?
apt-get dist-upgrade?
Best
Ale
--
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://m
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 5:03 AM Alessandro Vesely via Dng
wrote:
>
> On Sat 26/Jun/2021 11:45:46 +0200 o1bigtenor wrote:
> > so you're suggesting the use of
> > # apt update
> > # apt full-grade
> > or is that
> > # apt full-upgrade?
>
> apt-get dist-upgrade?
>
Methinks that's something else a
On 26-06-2021 11:45, o1bigtenor via Dng wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 6:10 PM Patrick Bartek via Dng
wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:34:32 +0200
Alessandro Vesely via Dng wrote:
On Tue 15/Jun/2021 20:41:09 +0200 Patrick Bartek via Dng wrote:
I have found that each desktop uses its own method
On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 04:45:46 -0500
o1bigtenor wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 6:10 PM Patrick Bartek via Dng
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:34:32 +0200
> > Alessandro Vesely via Dng wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue 15/Jun/2021 20:41:09 +0200 Patrick Bartek via Dng wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I
On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 13:33:56 +0200
"d...@d404.nl" wrote:
> On 26-06-2021 11:45, o1bigtenor via Dng wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 6:10 PM Patrick Bartek via Dng
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:34:32 +0200
> >> Alessandro Vesely via Dng wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue 15/Jun/2021 20:41:0
Hi,
o1bigtenor via Dng writes:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 5:03 AM Alessandro Vesely via Dng
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat 26/Jun/2021 11:45:46 +0200 o1bigtenor wrote:
>> > so you're suggesting the use of
>> > # apt update
>> > # apt full-grade
>> > or is that
>> > # apt full-upgrade?
>>
>> apt-get di
Hi Rick,
Rick Moen writes:
> Quoting Olaf Meeuwissen (paddy-h...@member.fsf.org):
>
>> I think it's fair to point out that systemd-timesyncd only promises
>> Simple NTP (SNTP). How good a job it does of that is another matter
>> but at least it explains some of the "quirks" you mention below.
>