Hi.
I've just installed a couple of Beowulf systems, each of which has three
ethernet interfaces; one on the motherboard, and two on a PCI card.
I'm trying to work out how to give those interfaces the names I want; the
motherboard as eth0, and the PCI card as eth1 / eth2.
Historically, I've be
On 12-12-2020 14:15, Antony Stone wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've just installed a couple of Beowulf systems, each of which has three
> ethernet interfaces; one on the motherboard, and two on a PCI card.
>
> I'm trying to work out how to give those interfaces the names I want; the
> motherboard as eth0, an
On Saturday 12 December 2020 at 15:27:08, d...@d404.nl wrote:
> On 12-12-2020 14:15, Antony Stone wrote:
> >
> > According to https://wiki.debian.org/NetworkInterfaceNames the old 70-
> > persistent-net.rules system _should_ still work in Buster / Beowulf, but
> > I can't work out how to get it t
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 14:15:53 +0100
Antony Stone wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've just installed a couple of Beowulf systems, each of which has
> three ethernet interfaces; one on the motherboard, and two on a PCI
> card.
>
> I'm trying to work out how to give those interfaces the names I want;
> the mothe
On Saturday 12 December 2020 at 16:06:29, tito via Dng wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 14:15:53 +0100 Antony Stone wrote:
> > Historically, I've been used to udev
> > and /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent- net.rules doing this, where I
> > can specify the name I want for each interface according to its
Le 12/12/2020 à 14:15, Antony Stone a écrit :
> Hi.
>
> I've just installed a couple of Beowulf systems, each of which has three
> ethernet interfaces; one on the motherboard, and two on a PCI card.
>
> I'm trying to work out how to give those interfaces the names I want; the
> motherboard as eth
On Saturday 12 December 2020 at 16:28:04, Didier Kryn wrote:
> Le 12/12/2020 à 14:15, Antony Stone a écrit :
> >
> > 1. how can I get 70-persistent-net.rules to carry on working under
> > Beowulf?
> >
> > 2. what's the "correct" way to get my interfaces named the way I want,
> > according to the
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 02:15:53PM +0100, Antony Stone wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've just installed a couple of Beowulf systems, each of which has three
> ethernet interfaces; one on the motherboard, and two on a PCI card.
>
> I'm trying to work out how to give those interfaces the names I want; the
>
It really isn't that hard:
when the kernel starts it will give its default names to the
interfaces as ethN numbering them in order it initializes them. In
your case it will use the names eth0, eth1 and eth2 that get assigned
in whatever time order the kernel discovers them in.
Eventually(!) the h
On Saturday 12 December 2020 at 14:15:53, Antony Stone wrote:
> Historically, I've been used to udev and /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-
> net.rules doing this, where I can specify the name I want for each
> interface according to its MAC address.
> 1. how can I get 70-persistent-net.rules to ca
On Saturday 12 December 2020 at 23:11:25, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote:
> It really isn't that hard:
>
> when the kernel starts it will give its default names to the
> interfaces as ethN numbering them in order it initializes them. In
> your case it will use the names eth0, eth1 and eth2 that ge
On 12/12 23:22, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Saturday 12 December 2020 at 23:11:25, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote:
> ...
>
> 1. Why is this so totally different from what I could previously do using
> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules under jessie and earlier releases?
>
> 2. https://wiki.de
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 23:11:52 +0100
Antony Stone wrote:
> I would still *really like* to know:
>
> 1. how can I get 70-persistent-net.rules to carry on working as it
> used to, under Beowulf? (I never had to do this sort of workaround
> in Jessie or before.)
Hallo Antony,
do I understand corr
On Sunday 13 December 2020 at 00:01:11, Florian Zieboll via Dng wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 23:11:52 +0100 Antony Stone wrote:
> > I would still *really like* to know:
> >
> > 1. how can I get 70-persistent-net.rules to carry on working as it
> > used to, under Beowulf? (I never had to do this
On Sunday 13 December 2020 at 00:01:06, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote:
> On 12/12 23:22, Antony Stone wrote:
> >
> > 1. Why is this so totally different from what I could previously do using
> > /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules under jessie and earlier
> > releases?
>
> If it worked for
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 23:11:52 +0100
Antony Stone wrote:
> On Saturday 12 December 2020 at 14:15:53, Antony Stone wrote:
>
> > Historically, I've been used to udev
> > and /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent- net.rules doing this, where I
> > can specify the name I want for each interface according to
On 13/12 00:40, Antony Stone wrote:
> > If it worked for you previously then, a) there would have been rules
> > for double renaming,
>
> Please point me at where I should find these.
>
> I only know that /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules was the
> *only* file I needed to edit if I wanted
On Sunday 13 December 2020 at 01:09:18, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote:
> Well, the kernel modules makes the first naming, and assigns them as
> eth0, eth1, eth2. That happens before udev starts.
>
> The kernel refuses any attempt to name an interface to, say, eth0 if
> that name is taken.
>
> Th
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:53:35 +0100
Didier Kryn wrote:
> I don't make it an argument against xdm. Just cheating about your
> own arguments (~:
Didier, why didn't you make that suggestion to me 15 years ago? It's a
brilliant way to guarantee that if somebody logs out of X, they have no
logged
On 13/12 02:47, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Sunday 13 December 2020 at 01:09:18, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote:
>
> > Well, the kernel modules makes the first naming, and assigns them as
> > eth0, eth1, eth2. That happens before udev starts.
> >
> > The kernel refuses any attempt to name an interfac
Hi Hendrik,
Hendrik Boom writes:
> I wish everything user-configurable under /etc was under revision control.
> then we might even be able to have a vendor branch and a local branch.
Have a look at etckeeper.
I've been using that for several years now on a variety of machines.
The log for the m
On 04.12.20 19:43, goli...@devuan.org wrote:
> You might want to have a look at Debian's release schedule:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases
>
Does Devuan not follow the LTS schedule?
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
Because when Debian Releases X as stable, Devuan needs some time to
fo
On 2020-12-12 21:04, Adrian Zaugg wrote:
On 04.12.20 19:43, goli...@devuan.org wrote:
You might want to have a look at Debian's release schedule:
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases
Does Devuan not follow the LTS schedule?
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
Because when Debian Releases X as s
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 16:06:03 +0100
Antony Stone wrote:
> On Saturday 12 December 2020 at 15:27:08, d...@d404.nl wrote:
>
> > On 12-12-2020 14:15, Antony Stone wrote:
> > >
> > > According to https://wiki.debian.org/NetworkInterfaceNames the
> > > old 70- persistent-net.rules system _should_ s
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 21:15:32 -0500
Steve Litt wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:53:35 +0100
> Didier Kryn wrote:
>
>
> > I don't make it an argument against xdm. Just cheating about
> > your own arguments (~:
>
> Didier, why didn't you make that suggestion to me 15 years ago? It's a
> bri
25 matches
Mail list logo
