Quoting spiralofhope (spiralofh...@spiralofhope.com):
> > McQ! (4x80)
>
> Now I understand this. :)
Yr. welcome.
> As an aside, the RFC suggests a limit of 75, even for a signature, since
> this leaves space for quoting.
It does -- _but_ by their nature, .signature blocks ought not to be
quo
On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 12:38 -0500, goli...@devuan.org wrote:
> If you can't help him, please just be quiet.
I'll continue to speak my mind when I want to, but I'll choose my words
more carefully in the future (and hopefully think more about the fine
points of my argument before typing).
_
Steve, your response illuminated a distinction I had been making
without even thinking about it.
I'm just pontificating about advertisements now, so feel free to not
read, but personally, Steve, your advertising your site and books has
never bothered me in the slightest. It's on-topic and it's you
That kind of thinking is a slippery slope. Advertising is advertising.
Period. And signatures of any kind take up space even when they are
on-point philosophy, ascii art or [fill-in-the-blank]. But then the
netiquette police have a lot to bitch about on this list. Very few posts
get trimmed
