On Fri, 15 May 2020 14:44:06 -1000
Joel Roth via Dng wrote:
> Reminds me to revisit https://ewontfix.com/14/
> for Felker's Broken by Design article on systemd.
That web page changed my life. When I saw, on that page, how simple PID1
could really be, that was when I really started to despise sy
On Saturday 16 May 2020 at 11:30:03, Steve Litt wrote:
> You know, runit's or s6's process supervisor could be used, on systemd
> systems, as a tobacco patch to wean the user off systemd, one process
> at a time. As each daemon gets moved to runit or s6, that daemon's unit
> file name gets put in
Quoting Antony Stone (antony.st...@devuan.open.source.it):
> It may have been sold that way in the early days, but it's now
> infiltrated so many parts of the GNU / Linux system that just telling
> people (or showing them) that they can use something else to manage
> their daemons is no longer eno
On Sat, 16 May 2020 11:41:29 +0200
Antony Stone wrote:
> On Saturday 16 May 2020 at 11:30:03, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> > You know, runit's or s6's process supervisor could be used, on
> > systemd systems, as a tobacco patch to wean the user off systemd,
> > one process at a time. As each daemon get
On Sat, 16 May 2020 11:40:03 -0700
Rick Moen via Dng wrote:
> [1] E.g., I remain unconvinced I need a half-dozen different ways to
> refer to a device node.
If you're referring to the ethernet device being eno1 or enWhichUSB22
instead of eth0, or wxbd3 or wl21Poettering423 instead of wlan0, I
Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com):
> If you're referring to the ethernet device being eno1 or enWhichUSB22
> instead of eth0, or wxbd3 or wl21Poettering423 instead of wlan0, I
> prefer the new way. Here's why:
No, that's not what I meant (and network interfaces don't have device
node
hi,
Citando Rick Moen via Dng :
Quoting Ian Zimmerman (i...@very.loosely.org):
Hi Rick :)
Greetings, friend!
Is there a reference to a Debian mailing list (or a similar digital
history document) where the decision to switch to Postfix was taken?
Upon re-examination, I believe I erred, and
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 05:30:03AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> Runit and s6's process supervisors can also be used as tobacco patches
> for sysvinit.
>
What do you mean by "tobacco patch"?
-- hendrik
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://m
Hello,
Citando Steve Litt :
It's such a shame. Runit and s6 were both there, waiting to be picked
up and used. Both were 10 times easier than sysvinit. But n.
All init systems that want to be taken seriously, need to accept also
the system language..
As I understand, and was also
On 2020-05-16 13:10, Rick Moen via Dng wrote:
> I meant multiple subtrees of device node files classified in lots
> of different and overlapping ways, by-uuid, and on and on.
I'll take that one :-P
Last year I nearly lost all my image and audio data, some 100G. I guess
that's small potatoes toda
On 2020-05-16 16:51, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> What do you mean by "tobacco patch"?
It's an analogy with a medical device used to help smokers with quitting.
--
Ian
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
Citando Ian Zimmerman :
On 2020-05-16 13:10, Rick Moen via Dng wrote:
I meant multiple subtrees of device node files classified in lots
of different and overlapping ways, by-uuid, and on and on.
I'll take that one :-P
Last year I nearly lost all my image and audio data, some 100G. I guess
th
12 matches
Mail list logo
