On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 07:03:13 +0100 (CET)
freemedia via Dng wrote:
> ive admired your criticism of systemd for a long time:
> http://techrights.org/wiki/index.php/Librethreat_Database#Gratuitous_interdependency
The preceding is a very cool web page. I agree with everything on it
except (well cra
> The freedom to NOT run the software, to be free to avoid vendor lock-in
> through appropriate modularization/encapsulation and minimized dependencies;
> meaning any free software can be replaced with a user’s preferred
> alternatives (freedom 4).
Late to the party as usual
FOSS and the F
On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 07:03:13 +0100 (CET)
freemedia via Dng wrote:
> Steve Litt wrote:
>
> > Not Gentoo --- they're slowly sliding toward systemd.
>
> this is important to me, and ive looked for more information on the
> gentoo forums and website, and i cant find the trend.
>
> ive admired yo
g4sra wrote:
> FOSS and the FSF have not lived up to my expectations, my fault for expecting
> too much.
> I am now pinning my hopes on the future growth of FFS (Five Freedoms
> Software).
glad to have you aboard, g4sra.
i believe jaromil likes this as well, i certainly dont expect him to pr
Quoting freemedia via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
> ive written about this in more detail here:
> http://techrights.org/2019/12/15/us-constitution-fsd-usc/ it uses the
> american constitution as an example, though everybody knows the
> american one borrows a LOT of ideas from across the pond.
Since
> Since you mention that, I'm really surprised you managed to write a
long, long screed on that subject that nowhere even mentions
Montesquieu.
> (Of course, your concern wasn't about government structure but rather,
er, some highly abstract, yet very verbose, ideological point.)
gee rick, ive
Quoting freemedia via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
> gee rick, ive read this over and over to try to find something useful
> in it,
I'm dreadfully sorry my comments fell short of your needs. (You may
return them under warranty.)
> and i suspect what you were trying to say is "less is more"
Not ev
