Re: [DNG] Is Void OK? Was: Keep it alive

2018-05-20 Thread Alessandro Selli
On Sat, 19 May 2018 20:49:45 +0200 Arnt Karlsen ha wrote: > On Sat, 19 May 2018 16:57:07 +0200, Alessandro wrote in message > <20180519165707.504d5c33@ayu.localdomain>: > > > On Sat, 19 May 2018 at 16:42:49 +0200 > > Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 19 May 2018 04:25:53 +0200, Alessan

[DNG] ..waaay OT: Is Void OK? Was: Keep it alive

2018-05-20 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 20 May 2018 10:45:08 +0200, Alessandro wrote in message <20180520104459.1daedf5d@ayu.localdomain>: > On Sat, 19 May 2018 20:49:45 +0200 > Arnt Karlsen ha wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 May 2018 16:57:07 +0200, Alessandro wrote in message > > <20180519165707.504d5c33@ayu.localdomain>: > >

Re: [DNG] Is Void OK? Was: Keep it alive

2018-05-20 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 05:44:08PM +0100, KatolaZ wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 12:17:58PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > > On Thu, 17 May 2018 11:16:50 +0100 > > KatolaZ wrote: > > > > > https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/05/16/contributing_to_keep_small_linux_alive/ > > > > > > Very interesting

Re: [DNG] ..waaay OT: Is Void OK? Was: Keep it alive

2018-05-20 Thread Alessandro Selli
On Sun, 20 May 2018 at 13:06:45 +0200 Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Sun, 20 May 2018 10:45:08 +0200, Alessandro wrote in message > <20180520104459.1daedf5d@ayu.localdomain>: > >> On Sat, 19 May 2018 20:49:45 +0200 >> Arnt Karlsen ha wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 19 May 2018 16:57:07 +0200, Alessandro wr

[DNG] LibreOffice removed with autoremove

2018-05-20 Thread Vernon Geiszler
Running ascii. Did update then autoremove. Did not look close enough at the packages being removed. Libreoffice was one package removed. It will not install. Going down through the dependencies that will not install, I arrived at this: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libpython

Re: [DNG] LibreOffice removed with autoremove

2018-05-20 Thread wirelessduck
> On 21 May 2018, at 04:20, Vernon Geiszler wrote: > > Running ascii. Did update then autoremove. Did not look close enough > at the packages being removed. Libreoffice was one package removed. > It will not install. Going down through the dependencies that will > not install, I arrived at t

Re: [DNG] LibreOffice removed with autoremove

2018-05-20 Thread wirelessduck
> On 21 May 2018, at 10:08, wirelessd...@gmail.com wrote: > > >> On 21 May 2018, at 04:20, Vernon Geiszler wrote: >> >> Running ascii. Did update then autoremove. Did not look close enough >> at the packages being removed. Libreoffice was one package removed. >> It will not install. Going

Re: [DNG] LibreOffice removed with autoremove

2018-05-20 Thread Vernon Geiszler
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 5:44 PM, wrote: > >> On 21 May 2018, at 10:08, wirelessd...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >>> On 21 May 2018, at 04:20, Vernon Geiszler wrote: >>> >>> Running ascii. Did update then autoremove. Did not look close enough >>> at the packages being removed. Libreoffice was one p

Re: [DNG] LibreOffice removed with autoremove

2018-05-20 Thread wirelessduck
> On 21 May 2018, at 13:35, Vernon Geiszler wrote: > > This is the output from apt-cache policy: > > libpython3.5-stdlib: > Installed: 3.5.3-3 > Candidate: 3.5.3-3 > Version table: > *** 3.5.3-3 100 >100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 3.5.3-1 500 >500 http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/