After upgrading from Devuan Jessie to Devuan Ascii, I found that some
packages were not properly upgraded because of wrong version numbers.
Example: desktop-base is version 1:0.99 in ascii, but had a higher
version number in Jessie before, so the dist-upgrade kept the Jessie
version.
I cleane
Am 2017-12-26 17:37, schrieb J. Fahrner:
I now have a clean ascii install without orphaned packages. But now
I'm missing some Devuan theme files, like grub oder slim theme. Which
package contains the Devuan theme files in ascii?
I found my old netbook which yet has Jessie installed. The Jessie
On 12/26/2017 11:57 AM, J. Fahrner wrote:
> Am 2017-12-26 17:37, schrieb J. Fahrner:
>
>> I now have a clean ascii install without orphaned packages. But now
>> I'm missing some Devuan theme files, like grub oder slim theme. Which
>> package contains the Devuan theme files in ascii?
>
> I found m
Hi,
udevd calls mtp-probe:
udevd[436]: failed to execute '/lib/udev/mtp-probe' 'mtp-probe
/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:14.0/usb3/3-4 3 2': No such file or
directory
mtp-probe is contained in libmtp-runtime, so eudev should have a
dependency to libmtp-runtime.
Jochen
_
Hi,
is there some problem with the naming of network interfaces?
I have the following lines in my boot log:
Sat Dec 23 10:41:48 2017: [] Configuring network
interfaces...ifquery: unknown interface eth0
Sat Dec 23 10:41:48 2017: ifup: unknown interface eth0
Sat Dec 23 10:41:48 2017: FAIL fa
On 171226-19:17+0100, J. Fahrner wrote:
> Hi,
> is there some problem with the naming of network interfaces?
>
> I have the following lines in my boot log:
>
> Sat Dec 23 10:41:48 2017: [] Configuring network interfaces...ifquery:
> unknown interface eth0
> Sat Dec 23 10:41:48 2017: ifup: unk
On Tue, 2017-12-26 at 19:17 +0100, J. Fahrner wrote:
> Hi,
> is there some problem with the naming of network interfaces?
>
> I have the following lines in my boot log:
>
> Sat Dec 23 10:41:48 2017: [] Configuring network
> interfaces...ifquery: unknown interface eth0
> Sat Dec 23 10:41:48 2
Am 2017-12-26 19:47, schrieb Svante Signell:
Sat Dec 23 10:41:48 2017: [] Configuring network
interfaces...ifquery: unknown interface eth0
Sat Dec 23 10:41:48 2017: ifup: unknown interface eth0
Sat Dec 23 10:41:48 2017: FAIL failed.
Please state which version of eudev you have installed
Am 2017-12-26 19:41, schrieb Miroslav Rovis:
What ethers you have? Try:
# ip l show
$ ip l show
1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN mode
DEFAULT group default qlen 1
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
2: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast
state DOWN mode DEFAU
On 171226-20:04+0100, J. Fahrner wrote:
> Am 2017-12-26 19:41, schrieb Miroslav Rovis:
> > What ethers you have? Try:
> >
> > # ip l show
>
> $ ip l show
> 1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN mode
> DEFAULT group default qlen 1
> link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
J. Fahrner wrote on 27/12/17 06:04:
[snio]
eth0 works normal in network-manager. The error is only during boot. I'm
wondering why ifup tries to activate eth0, since this is not in
/etc/network/interfaces. Where does this info come from, that it should
enable eth0? Does it come from udevd?
Yes,
Hello,
can someone provide me with proper and full repository list for ascii,
including proposed updates, security, updates and backports?
I am noticing some strange behavior with packages.devuan.org/devuan and
auto.mirror.devuan.org/merged - not all packages available in both repos so
I guess I n
As I understand it, there are a few new file systems somewhat
available on Linux -- ZFS, XFS, and Btrfs.
But soe are still under development, ZFS is pparently under a
prolematic license, and I don't know about XFS.
I've onece heard about one of the new systems that one shouldn't
bother using i
Quoting Hendrik Boom (hend...@topoi.pooq.com):
> As I understand it, there are a few new file systems somewhat
> available on Linux -- ZFS, XFS, and Btrfs.
>
> But soe are still under development, ZFS is pparently under a
> prolematic license, and I don't know about XFS.
>
> I've onece heard a
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 05:20:58PM -0800, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Hendrik Boom (hend...@topoi.pooq.com):
>
> > As I understand it, there are a few new file systems somewhat
> > available on Linux -- ZFS, XFS, and Btrfs.
> >
> > But soe are still under development, ZFS is pparently under a
>
Quoting Hendrik Boom (hend...@topoi.pooq.com):
[RAID1:]
> It's not backup in any normally robust sense of the word. It does
> provide a bit of backup against one potential threat -- minor
> localized hard drive failures.
Which is properly called rendundancy, in contrast to backup. (You mig
On 12/26/17 6:22 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 05:20:58PM -0800, Rick Moen wrote:
>> Quoting Hendrik Boom (hend...@topoi.pooq.com):
>>
[ DELETED ]
>
> I'll have about half a gig of RAM. Does this rule out ZFS or just
> make it moderately slower? I'm not going to be running mi
Am 2017-12-26 23:56, schrieb Ralph Ronnquist:
Yes, eudev has code to test the interfaces from 80-ifupdown.rules,
which causes /lib/idev/ifupdown-hotplug to run, and that will use
ifquery for checking whether the interface concerned has an
allow-hotplug in /etc/network/interfaces.
Thanks for tha
Hi,
after upgrading to Ascii I have the following failure on boot. Any ideas
what's causing this?
Wed Dec 27 07:24:25 2017: [info] Loading kernel module lp.
Wed Dec 27 07:24:25 2017: [info] Loading kernel module ppdev.
Wed Dec 27 07:24:25 2017: [info] Loading kernel module parport_pc.
Wed Dec 2
J. Fahrner wrote on 27/12/17 17:41:
Hi,
after upgrading to Ascii I have the following failure on boot. Any ideas
what's causing this?
Wed Dec 27 07:24:25 2017: [info] Loading kernel module lp.
Wed Dec 27 07:24:25 2017: [info] Loading kernel module ppdev.
Wed Dec 27 07:24:25 2017: [info] Loading
Am 2017-12-27 07:57, schrieb Ralph Ronnquist:
Probably you have the dangling link /etc/rcS.d/S11udev-finish (or
similar), which would be a remnant from the udev package, and it
should have been removed when udev was removed.
Possibly there is also a dangling /etc/rcS.d/S02udev.
It's unclear to
21 matches
Mail list logo
