Although I am pro-choice regarding software, I am one who actually
tried to use systemd on a few occasions. However, I was every time
disappointed by its performance. After that, I had to revert back to
another init completely removing it in the process.
This machine has Devuan ASCII installed whi
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 08:50:12 +0300
m712 wrote:
> I want to install Debian Jessie via Linux Deploy on my Android device
> (as a chroot), then migrate it to Devuan Jessie then ASCII. What's
> the status on armhf architecture on Devuan? Anyone use it on an ARM
> device?
my raspi 2b is running fine
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:40:06 +1100
Fulano Diego Perez wrote:
> anybody have advice about getting virt-manager working ?
>
> what are required perms for qcows ?
>
> always get similar errors on any debian distro except subgraph which
> always works without changing perms, currently 600 root:root
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 07:12:18AM +0100, J. Fahrner wrote:
> Hi,
> there is a Thunderbird security update available in stable-security, which
> updates Thunderbird from version 45 to 52. The thunderbird-l10n-* packages
> still require version 45.
>
> apt-get output:
> The following packages have
Hi,
m712 writes:
> On October 28, 2017 11:22:49 AM GMT+03:00, Rick Moen
> wrote:
>>(But sure, fixing the runit-init package
>>would be a nice-to-have.)
> I have a proposal for this. Basically, have an install script which does
> something like this (I'm not familiar with the Debian packaging s
On November 1, 2017 5:12:53 PM GMT+03:00, zap wrote:
>Also another slogan for systemd: "*The**Donald Trump**of **Init*!"
Please no political jokes. Not everyone shares the same political opinion and
the joke may be offensive to some.
--- :^) --- :^) --- :^) --- :^) --- :^) --- :^) --- :^) --- :
> Please no political jokes. Not everyone shares the same political opinion and
> the joke may be offensive to some.
I don't see why, but if it will keep peace then I will do so. But I wish
to know what you mean by political jokes... free software has a
political agenda too after all.
so I gues
>> systemd is a reality, and making sad or smart jokes about it does not
>> make it more palatable, or less of a threat.
> yep, you are right systemd is a reality, I just needed to vent somehow.
> and making my jokes is one way of doing so...
Do we need to start alt.systemdadmin.recovery?
__
I propose ``alt.sysadmin.rehab''.
On November 2, 2017 5:46:50 PM GMT+03:00, Jamey Fletcher wrote:
>>> systemd is a reality, and making sad or smart jokes about it does
>not
>>> make it more palatable, or less of a threat.
>
>> yep, you are right systemd is a reality, I just needed to vent
>someho
El 02/11/17 a les 14:58, zap ha escrit:
>
>> Please no political jokes. Not everyone shares the same political opinion
>> and the joke may be offensive to some.
>
> I don't see why, but if it will keep peace then I will do so. But I wish
> to know what you mean by political jokes... free softwar
On 2017-11-02 10:39, Narcis Garcia wrote:
Because, any other jokes or ultra-developed threads are just off-topic
and making subscribers to unsubscribe some day.
___
Yes, these long useless threads where everyone tries to have the last
word push p
On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 at 20:40:51 -0400
"taii...@gmx.com" wrote:
> On 11/01/2017 08:23 AM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > You might consider the Purism laptops, one of which has a detachable
> > keyboard. https://puri.sm/products/
> https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3anjgm/on_the_librem_laptop_puri
On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 at 23:30:45 -0400
zap wrote:
>
>>> You might consider the Purism laptops, one of which has a detachable
>>> keyboard. https://puri.sm/products/
>> https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3anjgm/on_the_librem_laptop_purism_doesnt_believe_in/
>>
>> They aren't worth it.
> Yep m
Quoting Alessandro Selli (alessandrose...@linux.com):
> https://puri.sm/faq/
>
> Technical & Advanced
> Can I buy a Librem with a proprietary BIOS/UEFI?
>
> No. We ship with the free software firmware coreboot. We don’t ship Librem 13
> or Librem 15 with any proprietary BIOS/UEFI.
(Note: This
> Prove it.
>
> https://puri.sm/posts/purism-librem-laptops-completely-disable-intel-management-engine/
Something tells me you won't accept any other answer except your own, so
I will pass.
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 15:03:36 -0400
zap wrote:
>
> > Prove it.
> >
> > https://puri.sm/posts/purism-librem-laptops-completely-disable-intel-management-engine/
> Something tells me you won't accept any other answer except your own, so
> I will pass.
I take any verifiable fact as proof. Don
I wrote:
> Coreboot itself is free software but by design hosts proprietary
> plugins. In that regard, it differs from its militantly free software
> fork libreboot, which of course in consequence supports much less
> software.
I meant hardware.
And I'd still appreciate it if Alessan
On 11/02/2017 07:35 PM, Alessandro Selli wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 15:03:36 -0400
> zap wrote:
>
>>> Prove it.
>>>
>>> https://puri.sm/posts/purism-librem-laptops-completely-disable-intel-management-engine/
>> Something tells me you won't accept any other answer except your own, so
>> I w
On 11/02/2017 08:28 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
> I wrote:
>
>> Coreboot itself is free software but by design hosts proprietary
>> plugins. In that regard, it differs from its militantly free software
>> fork libreboot, which of course in consequence supports much less
>> software.
>
>
> I
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 20:46:58 -0400
zap wrote:
> On 11/02/2017 07:35 PM, Alessandro Selli wrote:
>> On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 at 15:03:36 -0400
>> zap wrote:
>>
Prove it.
https://puri.sm/posts/purism-librem-laptops-completely-disable-intel-management-engine/
>>> Something te
Quoting zap (calmst...@posteo.de):
> Very well then,
> https://libreboot.org/faq.html#will-the-purism-laptops-be-supported
>
> that is one perfect example. If it were possible, I think libreboot
> would have said something by now about the intel_me cleaner making it
> possible.
This is significa
>> Coreboot does load blobs for certain devices, so it shouldn't be any
>> surprise that coreboot supports librem.
> They did not lie about this.
Hmm... Doesn't it seem odd though that they call themselves purism and
haven't fully removed the intel ME stuff...?
I dunno, it just seems fishy to m
In the interest of not starting a big argument again this will by my
last reply on this thread.
On 11/02/2017 01:14 PM, Alessandro Selli wrote:
They are fully worth it.
Certainly not for the price they are charging, for $2K one could buy 5
Lenovo G505S laptops which are owner controlled wi
On 11/02/2017 09:47 PM, Alessandro Selli wrote:
Yes, I know, they failed disabling ME and they stopped even trying.
Their website/marketing says that it is "disabled" when it isn't.
Purism
has gone farther than anyone though possible just two years ago
They didn't make ME_cleaner or cont
I wrote:
> As it happens, as I mentioned, I just recently bought (to play with) a
> reconditioned Zotac CI321 w/4GB RAM and a 64GB SSD for US $125 with 1
> year warranty from Zotac after John Franklin mentioned the Zotac
> C-series here. (TY, John!) It has the Intel ME and Intel FSM problems,
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
