Earlier today, I filed a bug report against the devuan testing version
of 'mutt', but because I was using the stable version of devuan, and the
stable version of reportbug, the report went to debian.
Now, that was incompetent. Was it incompetent of me or of devuan or
both?
Updating a recipient e
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 08:15:59AM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote:
>
> Earlier today, I filed a bug report against the devuan testing version
> of 'mutt', but because I was using the stable version of devuan, and the
> stable version of reportbug, the report went to debian.
>
> Now, that was incompeten
Thanks for a quick response.
On 2017-07-21 13:24, KatolaZ wrote:
> Which version of reportbug are you using?
The offending version was 6.6.6~bpo8+1, and the upgraded (current)
version is 7.1.6+devuan2.1.
> jessie has 6.6.3+devuan1.3,
That version does show up on my apt-cache policy output, pin
On 2017-07-21 13:24, KatolaZ wrote:
> Please check this first, since dozens of people are using reportbug
> from jessie, and their bugs are correctly reported to bugs.devuan.org.
Enzo, I should add that though I manually submitted THREE bug reports to
devuan this morning, I have received neither c
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 08:39:50AM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote:
> Thanks for a quick response.
>
>
> On 2017-07-21 13:24, KatolaZ wrote:
> > Which version of reportbug are you using?
>
> The offending version was 6.6.6~bpo8+1, and the upgraded (current)
> version is 7.1.6+devuan2.1.
So it was not
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 08:46:27AM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote:
> On 2017-07-21 13:24, KatolaZ wrote:
> > Please check this first, since dozens of people are using reportbug
> > from jessie, and their bugs are correctly reported to bugs.devuan.org.
>
> Enzo, I should add that though I manually submit
On 07/17/2017 01:43 PM, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> ...
> I have the same. I have had some success with trying to map a physical
> port the dongle is attached to with a persistent name, and then the
> kernel, for reasons seemingly known only to it, reorders them and it all
> goes out the window.
> ...
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 08:39:50AM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote:
[cut]
>
> That version does show up on my apt-cache policy output, pinned to the
> default 990 from http://auto.mirrors.devuan.org/merged jessie/main.
>
> However, version 6.6.6~bpo8+1 was likewise pinned to the default 990
> from htt
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 02:01:46PM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
[cut]
>
> Hi,
>
> You should exercise some patience, please :) The bug reports are
> processed in batches. Your emails arrived on the server aroun 11:40,
> 11:50, 12:30 UTC time, and have been processed. You should have
> received confirm
On 2017-07-21 13:57, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 08:39:50AM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote:
> > Thanks for a quick response.
> >
> >
> > On 2017-07-21 13:24, KatolaZ wrote:
> > > Which version of reportbug are you using?
> >
> > The offending version was 6.6.6~bpo8+1, and the upgraded (curre
On 2017-07-21 14:01, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 08:46:27AM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote:
> > On 2017-07-21 13:24, KatolaZ wrote:
> > > Please check this first, since dozens of people are using reportbug
> > > from jessie, and their bugs are correctly reported to bugs.devuan.org.
> >
> > E
On 2017-07-21 14:14, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 08:39:50AM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote:
>
> Just to clarify, and since you are talking about "default" pin levels:
> the default pin level of standard Devuan repositories is 500. The
> default for backports and experimental is 100. So I can
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 09:40:27AM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote:
[cut]
>
> 2] Isn't it a legitimate devuan package from a legitimate currently
>supported devuan repository?
if you are not using the 6.6.3+devuan1.3 version, then it's not a
package in a legitimate currently supported devuna reposi
Boruch Baum wrote on 21/07/17 23:50:
On 2017-07-21 14:14, KatolaZ wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 08:39:50AM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote:
Just to clarify, and since you are talking about "default" pin levels:
the default pin level of standard Devuan repositories is 500. The
default for backports
On 2017-07-22 00:23, Ralph Ronnquist wrote:
> Boruch Baum wrote on 21/07/17 23:50:
> > Where else should I be looking?
>
> Perhaps you've set "APT::Default-Release "jessie";" ?
>
> Without that, you'll get the more balanced pinning of 500 and 100.
> I think I saw some Debian bug report (on apt?) fo
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Volpicelli
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 7:21 AM
Subject: [DNG] [Desktop-Environment] Cinnamon and MATE
hi to all,
I have build Cinnamon 3.0 for Jessie and MATE-1.18 for Ascii,
If anyone wants to try them just install from the usual
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:45:23AM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote:
> On 2017-07-22 00:23, Ralph Ronnquist wrote:
> > Boruch Baum wrote on 21/07/17 23:50:
> > > Where else should I be looking?
> >
> > Perhaps you've set "APT::Default-Release "jessie";" ?
> >
> > Without that, you'll get the more balanced
Boruch Baum wrote:
> The bad news is that if this is the only step I take, "apt-get" will
> want to upgrade 1248 packages (it looks more impressive when I write it
> out . . One Thousand, Two Hundred and Forty Eight packages) with a
> download size of 608 Mb.
What if, instead of doing "apt-get
On 2017-07-21 12:57, Ismael L. Donis Garcia wrote:
- Original Message - From: Antonio Volpicelli
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 7:21 AM
Subject: [DNG] [Desktop-Environment] Cinnamon and MATE
hi to all,
I have build Cinnamon 3.0 for Jessie and MATE-1.18 for Ascii,
If a
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: [DNG] [Desktop-Environment] Cinnamon and MATE
On 2017-07-21 12:57, Ismael L. Donis Garcia wrote:
- Original Message - From: Antonio Volpicelli
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 7
I wrote:
> All the time, a lot of people we stood on the sidelines willing them to fail.
Oops, s/we/were/
Personally I was watching and thinking "that's one hell of a task, I'm a bit
sceptical* but I sure as heck hope they manage it".
* Not knowing who these veterans were, and their level of sk
On 2017-07-21 13:30, Ismael L. Donis Garcia wrote:
- Original Message - From:
To:
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: [DNG] [Desktop-Environment] Cinnamon and MATE
On 2017-07-21 12:57, Ismael L. Donis Garcia wrote:
- Original Message - From: Antonio Volpicelli
T
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: [DNG] [Desktop-Environment] Cinnamon and MATE
On 2017-07-21 13:30, Ismael L. Donis Garcia wrote:
- Original Message - From:
To:
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: [DNG] [Desktop-E
On 07/21/2017 09:02 PM, goli...@dyne.org wrote:
Cinnamon 3.0.x (only amd64)
I think it's best to drop 32-bit support at all... it's such a waste of
time and resources.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/ma
Dragan FOSS wrote:
>I think it's best to drop 32-bit support at all... it's such a waste of
>time and resources.
As long as you're pruning, kill x64 as well, because the majority of
computers sold are using ARM architecture and run Android or iOS.
___
Oh, and then there's *this* as a reason for supporting arm:
https://notabug.org/libreboot/libreboot/issues/264
apparently someone is trying to reverse engineer arm without lima...
which could be very advantageous to devuan and other free software
distros...
On 07/21/2017 05:25 PM, Don Wright wr
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 04:25:55PM -0500, Don Wright wrote:
> Dragan FOSS wrote:
> >I think it's best to drop 32-bit support at all... it's such a waste of
> >time and resources.
>
> As long as you're pruning, kill x64 as well, because the majority of
> computers sold are using ARM architecture a
On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 16:25 -0500, Don Wright wrote:
> Dragan FOSS wrote:
> >I think it's best to drop 32-bit support at all... it's such a waste of
> >time and resources.
>
>
> As long as you're pruning, kill x64 as well, because the majority of
> computers sold are using ARM architecture and r
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 08:14:43PM -0500, John Morris wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 16:25 -0500, Don Wright wrote:
> > Dragan FOSS wrote:
> > >I think it's best to drop 32-bit support at all... it's such a waste of
> > >time and resources.
> >
> >
> > As long as you're pruning, kill x64 as well
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:45:23AM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote:
> The bad news is that if this is the only step I take, "apt-get" will
> want to upgrade 1248 packages (it looks more impressive when I write it
> out . . One Thousand, Two Hundred and Forty Eight packages) with a
> download size of 608
Am Saturday, 22-07-2017 at 03:14PM John Morris wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 16:25 -0500, Don Wright wrote:
> 1. Linux / GNU / X, this is the fork Devuan
No, not only Devuan. You forgot the great "Slackware",
the mother of Linux distributions. It's number one for me!
Unfortunately Slackware
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 08:14:43PM -0500, John Morris wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 16:25 -0500, Don Wright wrote:
> > Dragan FOSS wrote:
> > >I think it's best to drop 32-bit support at all... it's such a waste of
> > >time and resources.
> >
> >
> > As long as you're pruning, kill x64 as well
32 matches
Mail list logo
