> Am 02.09.2016 um 03:01 schrieb Daniel Reurich :
>
> Hi Attila,
>
> On 01/09/16 23:36, Attila Soki wrote:
>>
>> As far as i understand, vagrant failed to determine which os the guest is
>> running.
>
>
>> but, i dont know if there is any interest to solve this problem and then,
>> which on
On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 09:12:49 +0800, Brad wrote in message
:
> On 02/09/16 00:20, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> >
> > ..we honk that nice big red "No-Shit???" horn now? ;o)
> > https://www.torproject.org/docs/faq.html.en#Backdoor
> >
> > ..to the Tor people: systemd made its way into Debian on banana
> > r
On 02/09/16 01:38, Ralph Ronnquist wrote:
Ralph Ronnquist wrote on 01/09/16 08:51:
My worry is that the OS_TYPE=255/255/255 condition is not distinct
enough to make the action apply exactly and only for scanners. Comparing
with udev rules, you'll find there are more than a few rules for USB
dev
The key here is that linux doesn't assume one user. You get to answer, from
first principles, whether a particular USB device belongs to user x or to
root, etc. The mac has a stronger assumption that your mac belongs to you
(which is why the default hostname is "Dave Turner's Mac", etc) and what
On 02/09/2016 10:04, Attila Soki wrote:
> ...
> Of course a devuan plugin would make all this unnecessary.
> But before i can file a bug, or maybe create a devuan plugin, i must
> know which is the preferred way to identify devuan.
> grepping /etc/issues
> or
> grepping /etc/os-release
> or
> ?
Th
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 11:12:00AM +0100, Dave Turner wrote:
>
> dmesg knew all about my android tablet when I plugged it in, why can't vdev
> pick it up from there?
>
> this is what I had to add into 51-android having had a look at dmesg first.
>
> #my cheap Android tablet
> ATTR{idVendor}=
On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 09:59:29 -0400
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> Have things changed?
ISTR that they changed between Android 4 and Android 5; my 4 tablet mounted
directly, while for my daughter's 5 phone I had to install some packages.
Cheers,
Ron.
--
When men are pure, laws ar
It's come up a few times that a lot of problems "with" ${package} aren't
actually problems with the package, but people who didn't bother to learn how
to use it properly.
Today's XKCD seems to fit in with that quite nicely - especially the rollover
popup :-)
http://xkcd.com/1728/
_
Dave Turner wrote on 02/09/16 20:12:
On 02/09/16 01:38, Ralph Ronnquist wrote:
Ralph Ronnquist wrote on 01/09/16 08:51:
My worry is that the OS_TYPE=255/255/255 condition is not distinct
enough to make the action apply exactly and only for scanners. Comparing
with udev rules, you'll find there
