Hi,
Again, thanks for taking some of your time to explain this to me.
Sorry for not replying immediately. The past two weeks I couldn't use
any of my computers.
Edward
On 03/04/2016, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:30:24PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
>>
>> > You never retur
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 06:18:49PM +0300, Lars Noodén wrote:
> > I believe that the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is a relatively old project,
> > indeed (it dates back to 2009, IIRC), even if it looks abandoned at
> > the moment (or not actively developed, at least). I don't know whether
> > they are now re
On 04/14/2016 10:47 AM, Boruch Baum wrote:
>
> https://git.devuan.org/hellekin/slim/issues/1
>
I moved the issue where it belongs:
https://git.devuan.org/devuan-packages/slim/issues/10
==
hk
--
_ _ We are free to share code and we code to share freedom
(_X_)yne Foundation, Free Culture
Lars Noodén writes:
[...]
> I ran into minor graphics problems last year when I tried Debian
> GNU/kFreeBSD on a notebook, but other than that it seems good to go. If
> I had servers, I would be running it already.
Until a few years ago, the Debian-on-FreeBSD project actually still had
a web p
Hi all,
I was wondering if anyone could offer some clarity on how best to apply
patches on Debian derived systems? There are so many options across
apt-get and aptitude... I cannot make sense of them all:
apt-get upgrade
apt-get dist-upgrade
apt-get safe-upgrade
aptitude upgrade
apti
dev wrote:
I was wondering if anyone could offer some clarity on how best to
apply patches on Debian derived systems? There are so many options
across apt-get and aptitude... I cannot make sense of them all:
apt-get upgrade
apt-get dist-upgrade
apt-get safe-upgrade
aptitude upgrade
ap
dev wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone could offer some clarity on how best to apply
> patches on Debian derived systems? There are so many options across apt-get
> and aptitude... I cannot make sense of them all:
>
> apt-get upgrade
> apt-get dist-upgrade
> apt-get safe-upgrade
> aptitude
On 04/15/2016 03:27 PM, Mitt Green wrote:
dev wrote:
apt-get safe-upgrade
"apt safe-upgrade" doesn't exist, only "aptitude safe-upgrade";
Ah, yes. My mistake. Thank you for this and the related insight.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne
For what it's worth, much of the apt vs aptitude is preference and
opinion. However, aptitude does bit better of a job resolving dependencies
and preventing them from breaking your system. I personally have never been
a fan of aptitude, so I stick to the standard apt-get
update/upgrade/dist-upgrad
On 04/15/2016 03:36 PM, Linux O'Beardly wrote:
For what it's worth, much of the apt vs aptitude is preference and
opinion. However, aptitude does bit better of a job resolving
dependencies and preventing them from breaking your system.
Yes, That's what I've always read so I have always used a
10 matches
Mail list logo
