On 2/25/16, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
(...)
> Considering that shared objects and dynamic linking were originally a
> MULTICS feature (dating back to about 1965) and introduced to UNIX(*)
> with SunOS 4.0 in 1988, the best course of action to deal with people
> who are so afraid of changes that they
Le 29/02/2016 11:19, poitr pogo a écrit :
On 2/25/16, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
(...)
Considering that shared objects and dynamic linking were originally a
MULTICS feature (dating back to about 1965) and introduced to UNIX(*)
with SunOS 4.0 in 1988, the best course of action to deal with people
wh
poitr pogo writes:
> On 2/25/16, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> (...)
>> Considering that shared objects and dynamic linking were originally a
>> MULTICS feature (dating back to about 1965) and introduced to UNIX(*)
>> with SunOS 4.0 in 1988, the best course of action to deal with people
>> who are so
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 12:14:25 +0100
Didier Kryn wrote:
> I think it is different for Systemd supporters:
>
> - shut up, we know better than you
> - you have no choice but do as we tell you
Yeah, and how's that working out for them, now that Docker has switched
to an OpenRC distrib
Didier Kryn writes:
> Le 29/02/2016 11:19, poitr pogo a écrit :
>> On 2/25/16, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>> (...)
>>> Considering that shared objects and dynamic linking were originally a
>>> MULTICS feature (dating back to about 1965) and introduced to UNIX(*)
>>> with SunOS 4.0 in 1988, the best c
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 07:10:28AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 12:14:25 +0100
> Didier Kryn wrote:
>
> > I think it is different for Systemd supporters:
> >
> > - shut up, we know better than you
> > - you have no choice but do as we tell you
>
> Yeah, and how'
Tomasz Torcz writes:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 07:10:28AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 12:14:25 +0100
>> Didier Kryn wrote:
>>
>> > I think it is different for Systemd supporters:
>> >
>> > - shut up, we know better than you
>> > - you have no choice but do as
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, poitr pogo wrote:
> On 2/25/16, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> (...)
>
> > Considering that shared objects and dynamic linking were
> > originally a MULTICS feature (dating back to about 1965) and
> > introduced to UNIX(*) with SunOS 4.0 in 1988, the best course of
> > action to de
Jaromil writes:
> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, poitr pogo wrote:
>
>> On 2/25/16, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>> (...)
>>
>> > Considering that shared objects and dynamic linking were
>> > originally a MULTICS feature (dating back to about 1965) and
>> > introduced to UNIX(*) with SunOS 4.0 in 1988, the best
I use hotkeys extensively in Fluxbox. Fluxbox allows you to set each
hotkey individually, so you could have Ctrl-Alt-a perform one action
and Control-Shift-a perform another. I would like the configuration
to allow variables and multiple hotkeys. This should be a valid
configuration:
HOTKEY=ct
On 02/28/2016 07:38 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
> I suggest we use this mailing list for communication, and label each
> post with the word DE in capital letters on the subject line.
> Thus they'll end up arriving as [DNG] DE ...
>
We can do that, or use Mailman topics: so if you put [DE] in your
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Jaromil writes:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, poitr pogo wrote:
> >
> >> On 2/25/16, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> >> (...)
> >>
> >> > Considering that shared objects and dynamic linking were
> >> > originally a MULTICS feature (dating back to about 1965)
On Mon, 2/29/16, Jaromil wrote:
Subject: Re: [DNG] leveldb support proposal
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Date: Monday, February 29, 2016, 7:37 AM
>
> I am not the only one to perceive Rainer's contributions as rather
> questionable for the conversation
"Ivan J." writes:
[...]
> You aren't really contributing with any of your emails, if you can not
> help the Devuan developers on a technical level regarding my subject,
> please refrain from further mailing on this list. What you are doing is
> just derailing, nothing more.
You wrote
,
On Mon, 2/29/16, hellekin wrote:
Subject: Re: [DNG] A heads up about xfce's future
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Date: Monday, February 29, 2016, 9:03 AM
>
> Anyway a month or two from now, Discourse will be ready to surpass
> Mailman as a mailing list manager, thanks to a grant the Discourse team
Go Linux writes:
>
> On Mon, 2/29/16, Jaromil wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: [DNG] leveldb support proposal
> To: dng@lists.dyne.org
> Date: Monday, February 29, 2016, 7:37 AM
>>
>> I am not the only one to perceive Rainer's contributions as rather
>> qu
On Mon, 2/29/16, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
Subject: Re: [DNG] leveldb support proposal
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Date: Monday, February 29, 2016, 10:01 AM
Go Linux writes:
>
> On Mon, 2/29/16, Jaromil wro
Go Linux writes:
>
> On Mon, 2/29/16, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: [DNG] leveldb support proposal
> To: dng@lists.dyne.org
> Date: Monday, February 29, 2016, 10:01 AM
>
> Go Linux writes:
>
>> --
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 03:03:19PM +, hellekin wrote:
> On 02/28/2016 07:38 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> >
> > I suggest we use this mailing list for communication, and label each
> > post with the word DE in capital letters on the subject line.
> > Thus they'll end up arriving as [DNG] DE ...
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 03:03:19PM +, hellekin wrote:
> On 02/28/2016 07:38 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> >
> > I suggest we use this mailing list for communication, and label each
> > post with the word DE in capital letters on the subject line.
> > Thus they'll end up arriving as [DNG] DE ...
On 02/25/16 20:12, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
"Ivan J." writes:
>Is there interest in Devuan supporting multiple versions of leveldb?
>Why I am wondering is because of Bitcoin and its code. Currently Bitcoin
>statically links db-4.8 and it is used for having wallet support in
>Bitcoin Core.
libd
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, aitor_czr wrote:
>On 02/25/16 20:12, Rainer Weikusat [1]
>wrote:
>
> "Ivan J." [2] writes:
>
> > Is there interest in Devuan supporting multiple versions of leveldb?
> > Why I am wondering is because of Bitcoin and its code. Currently Bitcoin
> > statically links
Rainer Weikusat writes:
> Go Linux writes:
[...]
>>> why would I care to impress you
>>> with anything . . . ?
>>>
>>
>> And therein is the crux of your attitude.
>
> You conjectures about "my attitude" happen to be wrong.
I was planning to let this rest here as this subthread is obviously
qu
Just to clarify about "default" desktop environment and what that actually
means.
The "default" desktop environment is the one that gets squeezed onto the
first CD/DVD of a set of installation media, as well as the one that's
installed if you just click "desktop environment" in tasksel without
spe
For the record.
--- On Mon, 2/29/16, Go Linux wrote:
> From: Go Linux
> Subject: Re: [DNG] leveldb support proposal
> To: "Rainer Weikusat"
> Date: Monday, February 29, 2016, 10:51 AM
>
> Congrats! You have made it to my filter list. Gonna have a lot less email to
> delete.
>
_
Why would someone go personal out of nothing
is still uncertain to me. Seems like, ignoring
things ye don't admire is a real issue nowadays.
Frankly, in communities I have ever participated,
and believe me, there are galore, I've never seen
such, but in Debian-related.
My two eurocents.
_
- Original Message -
From: Stephanie Daugherty
To: hellekin ; dng@lists.dyne.org
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [DNG] A heads up about xfce's future
Just to clarify about "default" desktop environment and what that actually
means.
The "default" desktop environme
Due to real(boring?) work I've had not much time to put in on
this.
I did get devuan-jessie-amd64-alpha4-netboot.iso installed in a
VirtualBox VM.
This went without problems.
Jude had already done some basic package-building that is present on
git.
However me who never ever ran debian and
Scooby wrote:
>However me who never ever ran debian and are somewhat unfamiliar with
>init here ran into problem getting vdev to run at start up?
There is actually a couple of documents available,
the first is README [1] and the second is How to Test vdev
[2].
>I tried putting it into /etc/rcS.
With respect to all parties, I don't see why any particular stance on
the list is going to make any material difference in Devuan at the
present moment. Devuan is in Alpha 4, and the decisions for this
version have been made. I think it is best to table these kinds of
debates for the next v
Le 29/02/2016 19:31, shraptor a écrit :
Due to real(boring?) work I've had not much time to put in on
this.
I did get devuan-jessie-amd64-alpha4-netboot.iso installed in a
VirtualBox VM.
This went without problems.
Jude had already done some basic package-building that is present on git.
H
On 2016-02-29 17:12, Stephanie Daugherty wrote:
> Just to clarify about "default" desktop environment and what that
actually
> means.
>
> The "default" desktop environment is the one that gets squeezed onto the
> first CD/DVD of a set of installation media, as well as the one that's
> installed
On Mon, 2/29/16, T.J. Duchene wrote:
Subject: Re: [DNG] A heads up about xfce's future
To: "dng"
Date: Monday, February 29, 2016, 2:30 PM
>
> I don't know if Devuan has inherited the 4.10 packaged in Debian, but I
> would heartily recommend 4.12, because the 4.12 has a significant
> upgrade
Didier Kryn writes:
[...]
> A few releases ago, intoducing a new init script in /etc/init.d,
> and the corresponding links in rc?.d has become a little more
> complicated, because the comments at the head of the script now
> consitute a meta-language describing the interdependencies of these
On 02/29/16 20:30, shraptor wrote:
But when I get to slim-login manager I get no keyboard.
This happened to me trying to build a Devuan_Rpi2.img (Raspberry Pi 2) :
exim4 works, but the keyboard is not detected and i can't access to the
prompt. I tried with a couple of kernels: Devuan's armmp
T. J. Duchene wrote:
>With respect to all parties, I don't see why any particular stance on
>the list is going to make any material difference in Devuan at the
>present moment. Devuan is in Alpha 4, and the decisions for this
>version have been made. I think it is best to table these kinds of
Hi,
Like, I assume many, on this mailing list, know what to do when they
opt not to install the default window manager or desktop. However, I
think, XFCE is a good choice, although on my T4400 2GB computer it
tends to be rather heavy. Window managers are attractive with respect
to low resource use
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:41:22PM +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>
> I think, window manager user configuration more or less rests on these tasks:
> a) configure some menu structure to access user programs
> b) configure a keyboard structure to access user programs
> c) configure wallpaper and scr
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 03:28:59PM -0600, Don Wright wrote:
>
> Until more specialized forums are available for discussion of specific
> aspects of Devuan, *this* is the place and *now* is the time for civil
> discussion of any and all matters of direction and policy.
And the most important part
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 06:17:49PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 03:28:59PM -0600, Don Wright wrote:
> >
> > Until more specialized forums are available for discussion of specific
> > aspects of Devuan, *this* is the place and *now* is the time for civil
> > discussion of an
40 matches
Mail list logo
