On 19 February 2016 at 05:11, dev1fanboy wrote:
> Little late to this thread, that sounds like annoying default behaviour
> and more of this same mentality that breaking backwards compatibility is
> OK, it's really not at all. Really it should be the other way, set -N to
> use the new wrapping. B
Le 19/02/2016 00:19, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
Didier Kryn writes:
[...]
>>That's a theoretical argument I agree with: I think the server/ service
>>management code shouldn't be part of init especially since it's
>>virtually unused but that's really a tiny addition to the process
>>starting c
Le 18/02/2016 18:05, Steve Litt a écrit :
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:15:55 +0100
Didier Kryn wrote:
> Hence the argument already exposed by several persons on this
>list, in particular Laurent: let's pid1 do*only* what no other
>program can do.
==
Hi all,
On 02/15/2016 12:08 PM, swdev wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 09:05:52AM +, Dave Turner wrote:
>On 14/02/16 08:55, swdev wrote:
> >Hi there
> >
> >Long time lurker - first post:)
> >
> >Thanks for all the hard-work from the Devuan developers.
> >
> >I installed devuan alpha2 maybe
Hi again,
On 02/19/2016 12:13 PM, aitor_czr wrote:
Hi all,
On 02/15/2016 12:08 PM, swdev wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 09:05:52AM +, Dave Turner wrote:
>On 14/02/16 08:55, swdev wrote:
> >Hi there
> >
> >Long time lurker - first post:)
> >
> >Thanks for all the hard-work from the Devua
Didier Kryn writes:
> Le 19/02/2016 00:19, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
>> Didier Kryn writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>That's a theoretical argument I agree with: I think the server/ service
>>management code shouldn't be part of init especially since it's
>>virtually unused but that's reall
Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> The abstract definition of 'runlevel' is (as far as I'm aware of it):
> "Set of processes supposed to be running".
That's what I understand it to be.
> Considering this, one can
> safely conclude that whatever 'Dennys' did, he certainly didn't to
> that. A somewhat educ
Aldemir Akpinar writes:
[...]
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2016-02/msg00026.html
For the sake of factual accuracy: As far as publically know, nobody ever
sent death threats to Lennart Poettering because of an opinion on system
differing from his own. At some point in time in th
Didier Kryn writes:
> Le 18/02/2016 18:05, Steve Litt a écrit :
>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:15:55 +0100
>> Didier Kryn wrote:
>>
>>> > Hence the argument already exposed by several persons on this
>>> >list, in particular Laurent: let's pid1 do*only* what no other
>>> >program can do.
>>
- I'm using a wireless Logitech USB keyboard which acts just like an
unreliable datagram service, ie, it loses, reorders or duplicates
keystrokes whenever it feels like that (wired version of the same
model is no better) -
Didier Kryn writes:
> Le 18/02/2016 18:05, Steve Litt a écrit :
[.
Hi all,
Did you watch the following video?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfKGXQnxIvE&list=PLV5TRjrpiwATav0Dlhd_GRjc2ZRuV26kR
A conference by a system administrator interrupted by Lennart Poettering
(at the end of that).
Cheers,
Aitor.
___
Dng
Maybe he's right, it's software libre. He isn't forcing anyone to adopt
systemd, it's distribution developers fault. If Gnome forces a dependency
upon systemd, dump Gnome. If you don wan't to sacrifice (name any piece of
crap forcing a systemd dependency), it's your fault.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at
Seen this before, I think he is a little gullible in this presentation to
believe there would be a reasonable back and forth and allows a dialogue to
take place during his presentation. So he really shouldn't have allowed a
debate until the end, but he had made some good points here I thought.
Not altogether true, but users can and should jump ship immediately when these
things happen (assuming they're not happy with it).
Cheers,
chillfan
On Saturday, February 20, 2016 2:47 AM, Emiliano Marini
wrote:
> Maybe he's right, it's software libre. He isn't forcing anyone to adopt
> system
Some interesting posts, I don't think it's directly related to systemd but the
mentality is not far off. Some developer likes the feature so everyone should
have it because that one developer likes it. Maybe most users won't complain,
but I bet those users won't be the ones who use the shell oft
15 matches
Mail list logo
