My new Asus laptop is EFI.
Running debian sid, no dual-booting or anything like that.
and cat /proc/mounts has this:-
efivarfs /sys/firmware/efi/efivars efivarfs
rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
DaveT
and for the sake of completeness the whole thing:-
cat /proc/mounts
sysfs /sys sysfs rw,
Svante Signell writes:
> On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 21:07 +, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> > And BTW: How many packages have you (meaning all on this list)
>> > volunteered to maintain??
>>
>> As far as I can tell, the "official standpoint" of 'Devuan' in this
>> respect is 'no help wante
Hi,
Although, some comments were mean, I apologize for my behaviour. This
apology has to be taken in the light, that I wish Devuan to continue
developing into a distribution, that can be used by all those who
respect freedom of choice. As I am one of those who became uneasy with
the introduction o
Hi,
I did all necessary changes in the netman project to rename it to:
"easynetaid" which is unique on google.
If someone suggests a serious name that is better suited than the new
name, I will consider it.
I pushed the changes. The GUI's help was debugged to work. Manpage can
be invoked by: man
Arnt Karlsen writes:
[...]
>> > /sys/firmware/ and everything in it is mounted rw on my Gigabyte
>> > legacy board with Devuan installed.
>>
>> That's true on my non=efi system, too, but it has
>> no /sys/firmware/efi.
>
> ..can an efi board set up with legacy boot and running e.g. sys-v,
> be
On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 10:42:04 +, Dave wrote in message
<56b71f7c.9060...@barradas.free-online.co.uk>:
> My new Asus laptop is EFI.
> Running debian sid, no dual-booting or anything like that.
> and cat /proc/mounts has this:-
>
> efivarfs /sys/firmware/efi/efivars efivarfs
> rw,nosuid,nodev,n
Arnt Karlsen writes:
> On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 10:42:04 +, Dave wrote in message
> <56b71f7c.9060...@barradas.free-online.co.uk>:
>> My new Asus laptop is EFI.
>> Running debian sid, no dual-booting or anything like that.
>> and cat /proc/mounts has this:-
>>
>> efivarfs /sys/firmware/efi/efivars
On 02/07/2016 01:00 PM, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>
> If someone suggests a serious name that is better suited than the new
> name, I will consider it.
>
I'd like to suggest *netbeam*, also callable by `beammeup` or `beam [me]
up [Scotty]`
There's no netbeam package nor any `beam` UNIX command.
==
On 2016-02-07 03:26, shraptor wrote:
On 2016-02-06 17:18, dev1fanboy wrote:
So I am trying to build transmission-daemon without systemd, was just
testing this locally and run into an issue. It can be built without
systemd but transmission-gtk will no longer start downloading
torrents.
I think i
Thanks for confirming, after your last reply I tried from source and after
tinking with the flags to match the ones by debian, I found the same thing you
just mentioned. It's when transmission-daemon is started that transmission-gtk
(or qt) won't work and the reason seems to be transmission-daem
Le 07/02/2016 14:00, Edward Bartolo a écrit :
I did all necessary changes in the netman project to rename it to:
"easynetaid" which is unique on google.
It's a very long name!
Didier
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglist
On Sun, 2/7/16, Edward Bartolo wrote:
Subject: [DNG] Easynetaid is for now netman's new name
To: "dng"
Date: Sunday, February 7, 2016, 7:00 AM
Hi,
I did all necessary changes in the netman project to rename it to:
"easynetaid" which is unique on google.
If someone suggests a serious name
Turns out both can work on debian jessie, so can't fix this unless there is a
patch somewhere.
Cheers,
chillfan
On Sunday, February 7, 2016 3:41 PM, dev1fanboy
wrote:
> Thanks for confirming, after your last reply I tried from source and after
> tinking with the flags to match the ones by de
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 13:34:11 +0100, Arnt wrote in message
<20160206133411.74d85...@nb6.lan>:
> On Sat, 06 Feb 2016 01:46:21 +0100, aitor_czr wrote in message
> <56b5425d.6020...@gnuinos.org>:
>
> > On 02/05/2016 07:18 PM, Go Linux wrote:
> > > Every name I came up with was already in multiple u
On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 14:55:27 +
hellekin wrote:
> I'd like to suggest *netbeam*, also callable by `beammeup` or `beam [me]
> up [Scotty]`
I dont want to be beamed "up Scotty" ...
Cheers,
Ron.
--
As long as the answer is right,
who cares if the q
Hi,
I suggest you do some software analysis for:
a) libraries
b) functions exported by these libraries
c) functions imported by the executable you are interested in running.
This way you should be a able to determine which function/s are linked
to from dbus and/or systemd.
There are CLI tools fo
On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 14:55:27 +, hellekin wrote in message
<56b75adf.6090...@dyne.org>:
> On 02/07/2016 01:00 PM, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> >
> > If someone suggests a serious name that is better suited than the
> > new name, I will consider it.
> >
>
> I'd like to suggest *netbeam*, also call
Turns out both can work on debian jessie, so can't fix this unless
there is a patch somewhere.
Do you mean both transmission-gtk and transmission-daemon ?
I tested some more and if you define another port than default
then you can run transmission-gtk and transmission-daemon
at the same time.
> I never meant to insinuate or otherwise say anything about your
> programming skill, I'm talking about how easily your netbarx name
> can become "netbarf" and you proved my point by reading it as
> "netbark" in your first response to me.
This lack of strength is something that I have to face.
>
On Sun, 07 Feb 2016 14:47:54 +, Rainer wrote in message
<87pow84lwl@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>:
> Arnt Karlsen writes:
> > On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 10:42:04 +, Dave wrote in message
> > <56b71f7c.9060...@barradas.free-online.co.uk>:
> >> My new Asus laptop is EFI.
> >> Running
On Sun, 07 Feb 2016 13:10:16 +, Rainer wrote in message
<87h9hkmzt3@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>:
> Arnt Karlsen writes:
>
>
> [...]
>
> >> > /sys/firmware/ and everything in it is mounted rw on my Gigabyte
> >> > legacy board with Devuan installed.
> >>
> >> That's true on
Hi folks,
I recently got one of those new raspberry pi zero. The little thing
should have exactly the same hw of the first version of rpi. Hence, I
thought I could have migrated it swiftly from raspbian (jessie) to
devuan, and I was eager to post my report here.
Unfortunately, my enthusiasm left
Ah I didn't think to check that, it does work here when changing the port.
Maybe this behaviour is okay, e.g someone would normally use only one at a
time, or otherwise change the port. Anyone have any thoughts on that?
If it doesn't seem like the right behaviour I could try to change the defaul
KatolaZ writes:
> Unfortunately, my enthusiasm left room to frustration. To cut a long
> story short, apt-get dist-upgrade fails on unpacking bash_4.3, and in
> particular it seems that the pre-installation script is bein killed
> with SIGILL (Illegal Instruction).
You could put bash on hold,
ec
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 07:26:27PM +, KatolaZ wrote:
> I recently got one of those new raspberry pi zero. The little thing
> should have exactly the same hw of the first version of rpi. Hence, I
> thought I could have migrated it swiftly from raspbian (jessie) to
> devuan, and I was eager to po
On 2016-02-07 20:38, dev1fanboy wrote:
Ah I didn't think to check that, it does work here when changing the
port. Maybe this behaviour is okay, e.g someone would normally use
only one at a time, or otherwise change the port. Anyone have any
thoughts on that?
If it doesn't seem like the right beh
Message: 6
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 19:26:27 +
From: KatolaZ
To:dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: [DNG] Migration to devuan Jessie failed on rpi-zero
Message-ID:<20160207192627.gg23...@katolaz.homeunix.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi folks,
I recently got one of those new raspber
Gregory Nowak writes:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 07:26:27PM +, KatolaZ wrote:
>> I recently got one of those new raspberry pi zero. The little thing
>> should have exactly the same hw of the first version of rpi. Hence, I
>> thought I could have migrated it swiftly from raspbian (jessie) to
>>
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 09:01:25PM +0100, info at smallinnovations.nl wrote:
>
[cut]
>
> The original Pi is not fully armhf (ARM6 instruction set instead of
> ARM7) and your choice is to use armel packages or compile armhf
> with the arm6 flag.
>
The problem is that Devuan has only armhf so
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 09:07:12PM +, KatolaZ wrote:
[cut]
>
> The problem is that Devuan has only armhf so far :) I know the pi zero
>
Well, it seems that I am wrong here. In the "merged" repository
"armel" is present, and there is also a version of the installer for
armel, hence it should
I reckon so too, will sort it out then. Thanks for helping me figure out the
problem.
Cheers,
chillfan
On Sunday, February 7, 2016 7:57 PM, shraptor wrote:
> On 2016-02-07 20:38, dev1fanboy wrote:
>> Ah I didn't think to check that, it does work here when changing the
>> port. Maybe this behav
On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 21:07:12 +, KatolaZ wrote in message
<20160207210712.ga...@katolaz.homeunix.net>:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 09:01:25PM +0100, info at smallinnovations.nl
> wrote:
> >
>
> [cut]
>
> >
> > The original Pi is not fully armhf (ARM6 instruction set instead of
> > ARM7) and y
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 10:49:48PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
[cut]
> >
> > If it is inly a matter of recompiling for armhf with the arm6 flag,
> > shall we try to put together a devuan for arm6?
>
> ..yup, and it is worth the while starting from the Raspian
> Wheezy flavor a year ago, rather
On 02/07/2016 11:09 PM, KatolaZ ¡¡ wrote:
There are a lot of people out there using pis, and
some are already complaining about systemd, and many would love a
pi-vuan. Any volunteers around?:)
Yes :)
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://ma
Dear Edward,
On 07/02/2016, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 13:34:11 +0100, Arnt wrote in message
><20160206133411.74d85...@nb6.lan>:
>
>>On Sat, 06 Feb 2016 01:46:21 +0100, aitor_czr wrote in message
>><56b5425d.6020...@gnuinos.org>:
>>
>> >On 02/05/2016 07:18 PM, Go Linux wrote:
Can we Move On?
On 2016-02-07 20:10, aitor_czr wrote:
Dear Edward,
On 07/02/2016, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 13:34:11 +0100, Arnt wrote in message
<20160206133411.74d85...@nb6.lan>:
On Sat, 06 Feb 2016 01:46:21 +0100, aitor_czr wrote in message
<56b5425d.6020...@gnuinos.org>
On 08/02/16 11:58, aitor_czr wrote:
>
> On 02/07/2016 11:09 PM, KatolaZ ¡¡ wrote:
>> There are a lot of people out there using pis, and
>> some are already complaining about systemd, and many would love a
>> pi-vuan. Any volunteers around? :)
>
> Yes :)
>
I've previously said that I'd be inter
I can do testing, I have a few raspberry pi's, all still running wheezy.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:58 AM, aitor_czr wrote:
>
> On 02/07/2016 11:09 PM, KatolaZ
> ¡¡ wrote:
>
> There are a lot of people out there using pis, and
> some are already complaining about systemd, and many would love a
>
On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 22:09:44 +, KatolaZ wrote in message
<20160207220944.gc...@katolaz.homeunix.net>:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 10:49:48PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> > >
> > > If it is inly a matter of recompiling for armhf with the arm6
> > > flag, shall we try to put togethe
On 08/02/16 07:15, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
Gregory Nowak writes:
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 07:26:27PM +, KatolaZ wrote:
I recently got one of those new raspberry pi zero. The little thing
should have exactly the same hw of the first version of rpi. Hence, I
thought I could have migrated it s
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 02:00:26PM +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did all necessary changes in the netman project to rename it to:
> "easynetaid" which is unique on google.
That is a good name. Simple, unique, and descriptive. I wish all names
were as good.
-- hendrik
_
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:27:19PM +1100, Simon Wise wrote:
> raspbian is in between armel and armhf because debian armel is (or
> was then) compiled without hard float support while debian armhf is
> compiled for arm7 ... so since PIs are arm6 with FPU neither is
> suitable
Just to be clear, the
I have 3 raspberry pi's original B, B+, 2 B (quad)
I'm using the B+ as a headless server for apt-cacher, I use for live-build's
The 2 B I'm going to make a lightweight desktop, as it's better spec'd than
my netbook and used less power.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> On M
On 08/02/16 14:18, Gregory Nowak wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:27:19PM +1100, Simon Wise wrote:
raspbian is in between armel and armhf because debian armel is (or
was then) compiled without hard float support while debian armhf is
compiled for arm7 ... so since PIs are arm6 with FPU neither
On 08/02/16 09:09, KatolaZ wrote:
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 10:49:48PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
[cut]
If it is inly a matter of recompiling for armhf with the arm6 flag,
shall we try to put together a devuan for arm6?
..yup, and it is worth the while starting from the Raspian
Wheezy flavor
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:27:19PM +1100, Simon Wise wrote:
> >>My understanding is that both the rpi0 and rpi1 are based on a ARMv6
> >>chip, which makes them closer to armel than to armhf. So, I'm afraid
> >>you're stuck with raspbian for now.
>
> raspbian is in between armel and armhf because d
On 08/02/16 17:35, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:27:19PM +1100, Simon Wise wrote:
My understanding is that both the rpi0 and rpi1 are based on a ARMv6
chip, which makes them closer to armel than to armhf. So, I'm afraid
you're stuck with raspbian for now.
raspbian is in betwe
El 08/02/16 a las 07:35, Hendrik Boom escribió:
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 02:00:26PM +0100, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I did all necessary changes in the netman project to rename it to:
>"easynetaid" which is unique on google.
That is a good name. Simple, unique, and descriptive. I wish al
48 matches
Mail list logo
